Table 2.
Gag cleavage sites | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number | Trial arm | Trial week failure (pre-PI) | MA/CA 128–137 VSQNY/PIVQN | CA/p2 359–368 KARVL/AEAMS | P2/NC 373–382 TXXIM/MQRGN | NC/p1 428–437 ERQAN/FLGKI | p1/p6 444–453 RPGNF/LQSRP |
12 | CT | Pre-PI | -----/----- | -----/----- | N-N--/----- | -----/----- | -----/----- |
Failure | G----/----- | -----/----- | NTN--/----- | -----/----- | -----/----- | ||
13 | CT | Pre-PI | -----/----- | -----/----- | N-NV-/----- | -----/----- | -----/--N-- |
Failure | -----/----- | -----/----- | N-NV-/----- | -----/----- | -----/--N-- | ||
14 | CT | Pre-PI | -----/----- | -----/----- | H-A--/--KS- | -----/----- | -----/--N-- |
Failure | -----/----- | -----/----- | NTN--/--KS- | -----/----- | -----/--N-- | ||
15 | bPImono | Pre-PI | I----/----- | -----/----- | NSN-L/---S- | -----/----- | -----/--N-- |
Failure | -----/----- | -----/----- | NSN-L/---S- | ---V-/----- | -----/--N-- | ||
16 | CT | Pre-PI | -----/----- | -----/----- | NSN--/----- | -----/----- | -----/----- |
Failure | -----/----- | -----/----- | NSN--/----- | -----/----- | -----/----- | ||
17 | bPImono | Pre-PI | -----/----- | -----/----- | NSN--/----NK | -----/----- | -----/--N-- |
Failure | -----/----- | -----/----- | NSN--/----- | -----/----- | -----/--N-L | ||
18 | bPImono | Pre-PI | -----/----- | -----/----- | NNNH--/---S- | -----/----- | -----/----- |
Failure | -----/----- | -----/----- | NNH--/---S- | -----/----- | -----/----- |
The sequence at each of the Gag cleavage sites is shown for the seven patients infected with subtype C viruses, both at pre-PI therapy and at treatment failure time points. Sequences were compared with the HIV-1 group M consensus sequence9 using HXB2 numbering. Where no consensus residue was derived an X is present and mixed residues are shown in superscript letters. Clinical trial arm is shown: boosted PI monotherapy (bPImono) and continuation on combination therapy (CT).