Table 3.
Summary of qualitative feedback from prototype TMS-WrapLogic test users.
| Theme/Subtheme | N Statements | Percent of Statements |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | ||
| Easy to use and navigate overall | 7 | 12.2% |
| Aligned with local model/language | 3 | 5.3% |
| Certain assessments easy to enter (CANS, Demos, Needs) | 5 | 8.7% |
| Positive Input on Specific Functions/Features | ||
| Visual representations of progress (dashboards) | 7 | 12.2% |
| Team/meeting tracking (who, when) | 3 | 5.3% |
| Aids in supervision | 2 | 3.5% |
| Reminders | 1 | 1.7% |
| Tracking tasks separately from workflow | 1 | 1.7% |
| Workflow | 1 | 1.7% |
| Problems/Challenges | ||
| Some fields may duplicate current HER | 4 | 7.0% |
| Assents confusing/subjective | 4 | 7.0% |
| Moving past a screen if not all info is known or entered incorrectly | 3 | 5.3% |
| Entering needs, strategies and tasks difficult | 3 | 5.3% |
| May be hard to us in rural areas | 2 | 3.5% |
| Slow speed | 2 | 3.5% |
| Logging in and changing passwords | 1 | 1.7% |
| Can't backdate | 1 | 1.7% |
| Recommendations for Improvement | ||
| Cut back on number of screens/clicks to enter information | 4 | 7.0% |
| Allow users to control what gets printed out | 1 | 1.7% |
| An assessment related to phases of wraparound might be helpful | 1 | 1.7% |
| Helpful if user could export assessments into Excel | 1 | 1.7% |
|
| ||
| Total | 57 | 100% |