Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 11;5:18188. doi: 10.1038/srep18188

Table 2. Differences in airway collapsibility, total sleep time, and arterial oxygen saturation associated with the use of a regular pillow versus a head-positioning pillow in the entire study cohort and according to the patients’ body mass index.

  Overall (n = 25)
Normal-weight (n = 13)
Overweight (n = 12)
RP (N0) HPP (N2) p value RP (N0) HPP (N2) p value RP (N0) HPP (N2) p value
Discomfort score Reference 3.0 (1.0, 4.0) NA Reference 5.0 (2.0, 5.0)B NA Reference 2.0 (0, 3.0)B NA
Compliance, % Reference 100 (100, 100) NA Reference 100 (100, 100) NA Reference 100 (100, 100) NA
Total sleep time, h 7.1 (6.4, 8.0) 6.4 (5.8, 7.4) 0.076 7.5 (6.5, 8.0) 6.3 (5.2, 7.5) 0.020 7.0 (6.3, 7.5) 6.5 (6.0, 7.0) 0.507
Mean SaO2, % 95.8 (95.1, 96.1) 96.1 (95.2, 96.8) 0.742 95.5 (65.0, 96.4) 95.7 (94.9, 96.9) 0.861 95.9 (95.7, 96.1) 96.1 (95.6, 96.8) 0.327
Minimal SaO2, % 85.5 (82.3, 91.0) 88.5 (86.0, 91.0) 0.028 90.0 (84.5, 91.5)C 90.0 (86.0, 91.2) 0.255 83.0 (79.0, 91.0)C 88.0 (85.0, 91.0) 0.054
ODI, events/h 4.2 (1.5, 8.9) 3.5 (1.6, 8.5) 0.247 4.0 (1.3, 7.7) 3.4 (1.0, 9.1) 0.366 4.4 (2.7, 9.1) 4.3 (2.3, 8.6) 0.346

Note: Continuous data are expressed as medians and interquartile ranges. Significant p values are marked in bold.

HPP, head-positioning pillow; NA, not available; ODI, oxygen desaturation index; RP, regular pillow; SaO2, arterial oxygen saturation.

ACollapsibility was measured in the supine position.

Bp < 0.05 normal-weight patients versus overweight patients using the HPP.

Cp < 0.05 normal-weight patients versus overweight patients using the RP.