Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 12;16:1057. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2277-7

Table 3.

Conditional reciprocal best BLAST (CRBB) comparisonsa of assembled Pinus patula transcripts to available Pinus taeda gene models and transcripts

Query P. taeda gene models P. taeda v1.0 P. patula v1.0
Reference P. taeda gene models (n = 48 391)
Hits at 85 % coverage 99.7 % 6.6 % 8.3 %
Hits at 95 % coverage 99.7 % 3.7 % 4.2 %
Contigs with CRBB 48 363 29 052 28 491
% Contigs with CRBB 99.9 % 34.9 % 54.7 %
References with CRBB 48 269 12 339 15 958
% Reference CRBB 99.7 % 25.5 % 33.0 %
Reciprocal Best Hit Ratio 1.00 2.35 1.79
Reference P. patula proteins (n = 87)
Hits at 85 % coverage 5.8 % 39.1 % 43.7 %
Hits at 95 % coverage 2.3 % 34.5 % 40.2 %
Contigs with CRBB 73 80 71
% Contigs with CRBB 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.1 %
References with CRBB 40 37 43
% Reference CRBB 46.0 % 42.5 % 49.4 %
Reciprocal Best Hit Ratio 1.83 2.16 1.65

aCRBB alignments for query sequences were generated against the available high confidence P. taeda gene models and the available P. patula protein sequences