Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 1;2015(12):CD010994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010994.pub2

Comparison 2. Combination of interventions versus no intervention.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 ANC coverage: four or more visits 6   Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Primary analysis (ICC 0.02 for studies Bhutta and Morris) 6 7840 Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 1.48 [0.99, 2.21]
1.2 ICC 0.08 6 7840 Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 1.45 [0.95, 2.23]
2 Pregnancy‐related deaths 3 13756 Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.70 [0.39, 1.26]
3 ANC coverage: one or more visits 5   Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 1.79 [1.47, 2.17]
4 Pregnant women initiating ANC in first trimester 1   Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.83 [0.47, 1.47]
5 Pregnant women receiving ANC from health professional 2   Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 2.97 [1.67, 5.30]
6 Deliveries in a health facility 5   Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 1.53 [0.96, 2.43]
7 Intermittent Prophylactic Treatment for malaria 0 0 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
8 Proportion of women with tetanus protection at birth 3   Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 1.48 [1.18, 1.87]
9 Preterm labour 1 607 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.74 [0.45, 1.20]
10 Low birthweight 2   Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.61 [0.46, 0.80]
11 Perinatal mortality 5   Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.74 [0.57, 0.95]