Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 1;2015(12):CD010994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010994.pub2

Laken 1995.

Methods 3‐arm, individually‐randomised RCT conducted in Detroit, USA; recruitment dates not reported.
Participants Sample size: 205 individuals.
Inclusion criteria: low‐income women who entered prenatal care at a local clinic before 32 weeks' gestation and who delivered at a tertiary‐level hospital.
Exclusion criteria: not reported.
Interventions Target: community (financial incentive intervention).
Arm 1 (51 women): women received gift certificates for each prenatal appointment.
Arm 2 (53 women): women received gift certificates and a chance to win in a $100 raffle.
Arm 2 (101 women): no financial incentive.
Women in all 3 groups were offered $10 for the postnatal interview.
Outcomes Triap Primary Outcome: kept appointments for antenatal care and postpartum care
Review outcomes reported:
Primary: ANC coverage (at least 4 visits).
Secondary: maternal mortality, health facility deliveries, perinatal mortality.
 Follow‐up: 6‐8 weeks postpartum.
Notes Funders: Michigan Health Care Education and Research Foundation.
Authors provided unpublished data for coverage, mortality and health facility deliveries by email on 16/1/15.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "random numbers were used" for group assignment.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Clinic staff members were blind to assignment, but women would have been aware of their own assignment.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported.
Recruitment bias (for cluster RCTs) Low risk Not applicable.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Missing data < 20% for birth outcomes (low risk) but high loss to follow‐up at the postnatal interview (45%).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Relevant outcomes reported, but insufficient data provided.
Analysis bias Unclear risk Methods not reported in sufficient detail.
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to make a judgement.
Overall risk assessment Unclear risk Insufficient information to make a judgement.