Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 1;29(12):1418–1423. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0523

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics and Diagnoses

Case Age Sex Indication for ureteroscopy Clinical findings (action) Histopathology Grade
1 79 M Suspected carcinoma Distal ureteral stone (basketed)
2 66 M Suspected carcinoma Renal pelvis tumor (nephroureterectomy) Urothelial carcinoma High
3 68 M Suspected carcinoma Renal pelvis tumor (nephroureterectomy) Urothelial carcinoma High
4 79 M Suspected carcinoma Renal pelvis tumor (biopsy) Urothelial carcinoma Low
5 66 M Suspected carcinoma No lesions detected
6 66 M Surveillance No lesions detected  
7 84 M Surveillance No lesions detected
8 80 M Suspected recurrence No lesions detected (renal pelvis wash) Atypical
9 88 M Suspected carcinoma Suspicious lesion in ureter (biopsy) Denuded mucosa and inflammation
10 61 M Suspected carcinoma Renal pelvis tumor (biopsy) Urothelial carcinoma Low
11 72 M Suspected carcinoma Renal pelvis tumor (biopsy) Atypical: prominent papillary cell clusters (renal pelvis)a
12 70 M Suspected carcinoma Ureteral tumor (biopsy) Urothelial carcinoma Low
13 81 M Surveillance Ureteral tumor (biopsy) Urothelial carcinoma Low
14 80 M Suspected carcinoma Ureteral tumor (biopsy) Urothelial carcinoma High
15b 80 M Surveillance Ureteral and renal pelvis tumors (laser fulguration)
a

Renal pelvis biopsy processed as cytology.

b

Cases 14 and 15 were the same patient.

M = male.