. 2015 Oct 5;169(4):2624–2639. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00995

Table I. Shoot and root dry weight (grams plant⁻¹) and protein, S, and Fe contents (milligrams plant⁻¹) of tomato plants subjected to varying nutritional stress.

Values given in parentheses are percentages of control. Data are means of six independent replicates run in triplicate. C, Control; D, dual deficiency; F, Fe deficiency; S, S deficiency.

Tissue and Treatment	Dry Weight	Protein Content	S Content	Fe content
	g plant⁻¹	mg plant⁻¹
Shoot
C	0.185 (100)^a	12.729 (100)^a	0.236 (100)^a	0.098 (100)^a
F	0.112 (60)^b	10.570 (83)^b	0.115 (58)^b	0.026 (25)^b
S	0.066 (35)^c	4.605 (36)^c	0.023 (4)^c	0.016 (15)^c
D	0.059 (32)^c	3.484 (27)^d	0.014 (3)^c	0.008 (8)^d
Root
C	0.024 (100)^a	1.494 (100)^a	2.199 (100)^a	0.750 (100)^a
F	0.016 (66)^b	1.126 (75)^b	1.292 (49)^b	0.186 (27)^b
S	0.009 (40)^c	0.961 (64)^c	0.099 (10)^c	0.111 (16)^c
D	0.008 (32)^c	0.764 (51)^d	0.075 (6)^c	0.061 (8)^d

Significant differences between samples (P < 0.05).

Table I. Shoot and root dry weight (grams plant−1) and protein, S, and Fe contents (milligrams plant−1) of tomato plants subjected to varying nutritional stress.

Table I. Shoot and root dry weight (grams plant⁻¹) and protein, S, and Fe contents (milligrams plant⁻¹) of tomato plants subjected to varying nutritional stress.