Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 30;169(4):2935–2949. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01192

Table I. Plant phenotype of control and transgenic OsMADS26 lines after 7 d of in vitro culture (MS), 72 DAG in greenhouse, and from flowering to harvest.

Results shown are from one of two independent biological repetitions that produced similar results. Reported values are the means and se for three individual plants of each line. A Student’s t test was done to establish whether the parameter measured in transgenic lines was different from corresponding control lines. BEG, Flowering beginning; DW, plant dry weight after seed harvesting; FD, flowering date; HTG_7, plant height measured at 7 DAG; HTG_76, plant height measured at 76 DAG; P1,000:, weight of 1,000 seeds; PW, panicle weight; TIL_76, number of tillers counted at 76 DAG. Significant difference: *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01; and ***, P < 0.001.

Line name HTG_7 HTG_76 TIL_76 BEG FD DW PW P1,000
cm DAG g
Wild type 6.06 ± 1.51 97.53 ± 0.59 12.33 ± 0.33 80.33 ± 0.33 81.67 ± 0.88 9.74 ± 2.34 15.18 ± 2.45 21.80 ± 0.71
OX0 6.34 ± 1.33 97.47 ± 2.06 10.67 ± 0.33 82.33 ± 1.20 84.00 ± 1.00 8.73 ± 0.87 9.52 ± 0.95 20.34 ± 0.62
DR0 6.72 ± 1.27 95.23 ± 1.36 11.33 ± 1.33 81.67 ± 0.67 83.67 ± 0.67 7.96 ± 3.80 8.88 ± 4.28 17.89 ± 3.93
OX1 3.84 ± 0.67** 100.60 ± 2.17 10.33 ± 1.45 80.00 ± 1.53 81.67 ± 1.86 8.00 ± 1.42 8.78 ± 1.50 21.39 ± 0.30
OX2 2.41 ± 0.92*** 93.40 ± 2.84 12.33 ± 0.88 83.67 ± 0.88 86.00 ± 1.00 8.21 ± 1.12 8.93 ± 1.34 20.38 ± 0.72
DR5-1 1.68 ± 0.68*** 87.90 ± 2.51* 7.80 ± 2.08 83.00 ± 1.15 85.67 ± 0.67 3.86 ± 1.07 4.21 ± 1.14 16.32 ± 0.48
DR5-2 1.61 ± 0.29*** 95.37 ± 1.84 6.67 ± 0.67* 82.33 ± 0.67 85.00 ± 0.00 4.93 ± 0.40 5.48 ± 0.39 19.79 ± 1.15
DR3-1 1.61 ± 0.31*** 90.53 ± 1.79 9.67 ± 1.33 85.00 ± 0.00** 87.00 ± 0.58** 6.62 ± 1.37 7.33 ± 1.65 21.42 ± 0.73
DR3-2 0.84 ± 0.18*** 97.20 ± 1.73 9.00 ± 1.00 84.67 ± 0.33** 86.33 ± 0.33* 7.76 ± 0.73 8.41 ± 0.67 20.01 ± 0.68