Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 15;5:18095. doi: 10.1038/srep18095

Table 1. Comparison of the oxygen gas (O2) saturation and pH characteristics in aCSF perfusate using the external oxygenator and in-bore oxygenator systems.

  pH Dissolved O2
aCSF Reservoir Negative Control (Equilibrated to Atmosphere) 8.22 ± 0.016 23.02 ± 0.08%
aCSF Reservoir Positive Control (direct bubbled 95% O2, 5% CO2) 7.36 ± 0.018 95.54 ± 0.97%
External Membrane Oxygenator 8.13 ± 0.085 43.43 ± 3.52%
In-Bore Membrane Oxygenator 7.32 ± 0.019 96.18 ± 1.87%

Measurements for the external and in-bore oxygenator configurations were taken in the perfusion chamber. When employing the external oxygenator, loss of dissolved CO2 (degassing) from perfusion lines resulted in an excessively alkaline aCSF mixture at the site of tissue perfusion. Similar pH conditions were closely replicated in an untreated aCSF reservoir left exposed to atmospheric air (negative control). Use of the in-bore oxygenator restored CO2 levels in the bicarbonate-buffered aCSF perfusate as evidenced by a return to physiologically relevant pH values. Compared to positive control measurements, aCSF gassed by the external oxygenator exhibited a 54.3% drop in total dissolved oxygen content between the oxygenator and perfusion chamber. When employing the in-bore oxygenator, no measurable loss of dissolved oxygen was noted. pH testing (n = 8), dissolved O2 testing (n = 10 [control & external], n = 6 [in-bore]). Values are reported as group averages ± standard deviation.