Table 2.
Comparison of PVC detection results
| PVC detection methods | Rec. no. | Total beats | PVC beats | Se, % | +P/Sp*, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NN+WT+TI [6] | 40 | 100239 | 6958 | 82.57 | 93.42 |
| WT-PCA+multi-dimensional (MD)-PSO [11] | 40 | 100239 | 6958 | 93.4 | 93.3 |
| 26 features+KNN [13]* | 44 | 100225 | 6996 | 97.2 | 96.7 |
| WBF [4] | 40 | 92588 | 6956 | 98.77 | 97.47 |
| HOS+GP-RBF-ARD [2]* | 48 | 109887 | 7117 | 92.19 | 95.15 |
| HOS+GP [12]* | 27 | – | 4080 | 84.7 | 97.5 |
| Haar WT+neural network with weighted fuzzy membership functions (NEWFMs) [5]* | 6 | – | 935 | 99.21 | 99.93 |
| WT+FNN [14]* | 7 | – | 943 | 99.02 | 96.67 |
| proposed method* | 47 | 107582 | 7023 | 89.69 | 99.63 |