Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 15;8:782. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1669-8

Table 3.

Results of the control and the common process of the main study. Filters, assembly and taxonomic assignment of five patient tumor samples with former BAC histology (AT1–5)

Quality and hg19 filters Main study
Samples AT1 AT2 AT3 AT4 AT5 5 samples AT1-5
Remaining reads 579,994 618,449 619,414 613,570 433,398 2,864,825
Control process
 Mapping (bowtie2) Nber of reads vs control samples 357,616 (62 %) 407,370 (66 %) 555,964 (89 %) 476,430 (78 %) 396 ,251 (91 %) 2,193,631 (76 %)
Remaining reads 222,378 211,079 63,450 137,140 37,147 671,194
Common process
 Global assembly (SPAdes) Contigs with reads from this sample 269 (45 %) 307 (51 %) 278 (46 %) 324 (54 %) 285 (48 %) 596 (100 %)
Contigs only with reads from this sample 23 (3.8 %) 41 (6.8 %) 31 (5.2 %) 32 (5.3 %) 57 (9.5 %) 45 (7.5 %)
 Taxonomic assignation (blastn) Contigs without taxonomy. Total length 54 contigs 4599 bases 66 contigs 13,688 bases 56 contigs 10,662 bases 70 contigs 15,426 bases 74 contigs 16,785 bases 162 contigs 36,852 bases (20 %)
Taxonomy count NA NA NA NA NA 96 % Eukaryota including 76 % Hominidae. 4 % vectors