Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 15;3:74. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0133-2

Table 2.

Mean relative abundance of detected phyla and genera by group and visit

Controls LAIV
Phylum Visit 1 (%) Visit 2 (%) Visit 3 (%) Visit 1 (%) Visit 2 (%) Visit 3 (%)
 Genera (in italics)
Actinobacteria 37.46 38.94 35.42 45.97 23.52 38.96
Corynebacterium 24.89 25.75 25.16 34.44 15.40 30.86
Propionibacterium 10.29 11.09 8.00 6.66 6.21 5.35
Actinomycetales 1.41 1.62 1.60 3.09 1.42 2.16
Firmicutes 32.18 25.56 41.56 40.71 51.34 44.99
Staphylococcus 16.14 12.79 25.28 19.04 26.37 24.53
Streptococcus 1.11 2.14 0.49 8.37 4.68 4.26
Bacilli Class 2.67 2.10 4.10 3.60 4.80 4.32
Bacillales 1.87 1.37 2.74 1.85 2.56 2.55
Proteobacteria 23.91 30.29 13.34 5.28 6.92 5.01
Moraxella 11.66 22.16 10.51 0.68 0.02 0.12
Pseudomonas 7.59 3.12 0.87 0.03 1.26 0.07
Enterobacteriaceae 0.92 1.20 0.18 3.29 1.69 0.47
Bacteroidetes 1.40 0.85 0.04 2.60 7.87 4.95
Bacteroides 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 6.26 4.13
Cyanobacteria 1.36 1.85 1.41 1.04 3.66 3.65
Streptophyta 1.21 1.79 1.40 1.03 3.58 0.88
Fusobacteria 0.042 0.023 3.88 0.61 1.78 1.17
Phylum cumulative 96.35 97.51 95.65 96.21 95.09 98.73
 Genera cumulative 79.76 85.13 80.34 82.08 74.25 79.70

The above shown are average relative abundances of the 6 most abundant phyla and 12 most abundant genera by group based on V3–V5 sequencing. Phyla are listed on the left while their corresponding genera are indented beneath. All OTUs had a ubiquity of over 90 % except Moraxella, Pseudomonas, Enterobacteriaceae, and Bacteroides. Bacteroides was notably almost exclusively present in the LAIV groups on visits 2 and 3. Cumulative genera and phyla representation is noted at the bottom