Table 2. Results of linear regression between bone metabolism marker and 25(OH) D in different sets of adjustment.
All | low calcium (<median) | high calcium (≥median) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
effecta | (CI) | p | effecta | (CI) | p | effecta | (CI) | p | |
Basic modelb | |||||||||
OC | 0.01 | (−0.07, 0.08) | 0.896 | −0.02 | (−0.12, 0.10) | 0.765 | −0.06 | (−0.16, 0.04) | 0.268 |
β-CTx | −10.2 | (−14.4, –6.1) | <0.001 | −14.4 | (−20.6, −8.1) | <0.001 | −9.0 | (−14.7, −3.4) | 0.002 |
β-CTx to OC ratio | −1.7% | (−2.2, −1.1) | <0.001 | −2.2% | (−3.1, −1.4) | <0.001 | −1.0% | (−1.7, −0.4) | 0.003 |
Extended modelc | |||||||||
OC | 0.01 | (−0.07, 0.09) | 0.795 | −0.01 | (−0.13, 0.11) | 0.872 | −0.05 | (−0.15, 0.05) | 0.343 |
β-CTx | −10.5 | (−14.9, –6.2) | <0.001 | −15.3 | (−21.8, –8.8) | <0.001 | −8.9 | (−14. 8, −3.0) | 0.003 |
β-CTx to OC ratio | −1.7% | (−2.3, –1.2) | <0.001 | −2.3% | (−3.2, −1.4) | <0.001 | −1.1% | (−1.8, −0.4) | 0.002 |
Full modeld | |||||||||
OC | 0.03 | (−0.06, 0.11) | 0.504 | 0.01 | (−0.12, 0.14) | 0.899 | −0.03 | (−0.14, 0.09) | 0.636 |
β-CTx | −9.6 | (−14.3, −45.0) | <0.001 | −14.7 | (−21.6, –7.7) | <0.001 | −7.8 | (−14.2, –1.4) | 0.018 |
β-CTx to OC ratio | −2.4% | (−2.4, −1.2) | <0.001 | −2.4% | (−3.4, –1.5) | <0.001 | −1.2% | (−2.0, –0.4) | 0.003 |
aeffect: beta for OC and β-CTx, %change for β-CTx to OC ratio.
bBasic model: adjusted for city, study, sex, fasting status, time of blood drawn.
cExtended model: basic model adjustment plus BMI, BMI2, growth rate, detectable testosterone/estradiol.
dFull model: extended model adjustment plus maternal and paternal education and physical activity.