Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 2;93(4):788–825. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12165

Table 2.

Effects of Different Weighting Systems on the Composite Score When Event Rates Are Reduced

Weighting System Calculation of the Composite Score
Equal weights (1/3)∗(20/100) + (1/3)∗(40/60) + (1/3)∗(20/40) = 0.456
 Reduce A by 10  (1/3)∗(10/100) + (1/3)∗(40/60) + (1/3)∗(20/40) = 0.422
 Reduce B by 10  (1/3)∗(20/100) + (1/3)∗(30/60) + (1/3)∗(20/40) = 0.400
 Reduce C by 10  (1/3)∗(20/100) + (1/3)∗(40/60) + (1/3)∗(10/40) = 0.372
Opportunity-based weights (100/200)∗(20/100) + (60/200)∗(40/60) + (40/200)∗(20/40) =
 (20 + 40 + 20)/200 = 0.400
 Reduce A by 10  (10 + 40 + 20)/200 = 0.350
 Reduce B by 10  (20 + 30 + 20)/200 = 0.350
 Reduce C by 10  (20 + 40 + 10)/200 = 0.350
Numerator-based weights (20/80)∗(20/100) + (40/80)∗(40/60) + (20/80)∗(20/40) = 0.508
 Reduce A by 10  (10/70)∗(10/100) + (40/70)∗(40/60) + (20/70)∗(20/40) = 0.538
 Reduce B by 10  (20/70)∗(20/100) + (30/70)∗(30/60) + (20/70)∗(20/40) = 0.414
 Reduce C by 10  (20/70)∗(20/100) + (40/70)∗(40/60) + (10/70)∗(10/40) = 0.474