Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct;60(10):432–440. doi: 10.1177/070674371506001004

Table 2.

Regression coefficient estimates of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnosis

Model effect Estimate RR 95% CI χ2a P
Sex
  Male 0.99 2.69 2.59 to 2.79 2799.69 <0.001
  Female Reference
Age group, years
  18 to 19 0.72 2.05 1.93 to 2.18 537.05 <0.001
  20 to 21 0.60 1.82 1.70 to 1.94 315.56 <0.001
  22 to 23 0.51 1.66 1.55 to 1.78 221.14 <0.001
  24 to 25 0.33 1.39 1.30 to 1.49 87.15 <0.001
  26 to 27 0.20 1.22 1.14 to 1.32 30.58 <0.001
  28 to 29 Reference
Region of residence by income quintile
  Rural
    Q1 −0.37 0.69 0.63 to 0.76 62.91 <0.001
    Q2 −0.23 0.79 0.72 to 0.87 25.68 <0.001
    Q3 −0.13 0.87 0.80 to 0.95 8.94 0.003
    Q4 −0.07 0.93 0.86 to 1.02 2.34 0.13
    Q5 Reference
    Linear trend 0.30 1.35 1.26 to 1.45 74.70 <0.001
  Urban
    Q1 0.10 1.11 1.04 to 1.18 9.94 0.002
    Q2 0.11 1.11 1.05 to 1.19 11.06 0.001
    Q3 0.06 1.06 0.99 to 1.13 3.08 0.08
    Q4 0.01 1.01 0.95 to 1.08 0.13 0.72
    Q5 Reference
    Linear trend −0.10 0.91 0.86 to 0.95 17.21 <0.001

RR = relative risk; Q1 to Q5 = income quintiles, with Q1 being the lowest and Q5 the highest

a

df = 1