TABLE 2.
Factor | Effect | p | Odds Ratio |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Multiple-variable logistic regression with ADCmin for identification of a TDLa | |||
ADCmin | 10.50 | < 0.01 | 36,152 |
No. of lesions | 0.731 | < 0.01 | 2.079 |
Incomplete rim enhancement | 7.57 | < 0.01 | 1948 |
Multiple-variable logistic regression with ADCavg for identification of a TDLb | |||
ADCavg | 2.30 | < 0.01 | 9.955 |
No. of lesions | 0.554 | < 0.01 | 1.740 |
Incomplete rim enhancement | 5.26 | < 0.01 | 193.3 |
Multiple-variable logistic regression with incomplete rim enhancement and no. of lesions (no ADC) for identification of a TDLc |
|||
No. of lesions | 0.489 | < 0.01 | 1.631 |
Incomplete rim enhancement | 5.34 | < 0.01 | 207.8 |
Note—All variables have statistically significant effects in the models, which indicates that they are statistically significant factors for identifying TDLs and that all should be factored into diagnostic confidence.
Overall model: p < 0.01, intercept = −12.74, AUC = 0.986.
Overall model: p < 0.01, intercept = –6.63, AUC = 0.954.
Overall model: p < 0.01, intercept = –3.72, AUC = 0.926.