Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Nov;205(5):1075–1085. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13970

TABLE 3.

Comparisons of the Multiple-Variable Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) ROCs With the Single-Variable ROCs and the Multiple-Variable Non-ADC ROCs

p (AUC)
Model (AUC) Corresponding ADC No. of Lesions
(0.717)		 Incomplete Rim
Enhancement (0.854)		 No. of Lesions and Incomplete
Rim Enhancement (0.926)
ADCmin, no. of lesions, incomplete rim enhancement (0.986) ADCmin: < 0.01 (0.839) < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
ADCavg, no. of lesions, incomplete rim enhancement (0.954) ADCavg: < 0.01 (0.749) < 0.01 < 0.01 0.025

Note—The multiple-variable ADC ROCs showed statistically significantly larger AUCs, which indicate statistically significantly superior diagnostic performance.