Table 2.
Variable | PROC GLM ANOVA | Multilevel Regression |
---|---|---|
BPA Doses | Improvement in Fit: Quadratic Over Linear-Only Model | |
Body weight | ||
Birth weight | = 0.550 | = 0.420 |
Week 3 weight | = 0.020 | = 0.019 |
Week 19 weight | = 0.193 | = 0.069 |
Energy intake, week 3-4 | = 0.358 | = 0.033 |
Energy intake, week 4-5 | = 0.201 | = 0.028 |
Adipocytes | ||
Gonadal fat weight | = 0.017 | = 0.022 |
Renal fat weight | = 0.019 | = 0.076 |
Total abdominal fat weight | = 0.035 | = 0.047 |
Gonadal adipocyte number | = 0.003 | = 0.002 |
Gonadal adipocyte volume | = 0.006 | = 0.052 |
Renal adipocyte number | = 0.011 | = 0.250 |
Renal adipocyte volume | = 0.121 | = 0.654 |
Liver and kidney weight | ||
Liver weight | = 0.003 | < 0.001 |
Kidney weight | = 0.137 | = 0.947 |
GTT and ITT | ||
Glucose tolerance test | = 0.062 | = 0.008 |
Insulin tolerance test | = 0.144 | = 0.137 |
Serum hormones | ||
Insulin | = 0.008 | = 0.004 |
Leptin | = 0.035 | = 0.349 |
Adiponectin | = 0.031 | = 0.099 |
Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; BPA, bisphenol A; DES, diethylstilbestrol; GTT, glucose tolerance test; ITT, insulin tolerance test; GD, gestation day.
aPregnant CD-1 mice were fed these doses of BPA (and DES as a positive control) in oil from GD 9 to 18, and male offspring were examined for these outcomes. The number of litters per treatment group was 14, 9, 12, 12, 11, 14, and 9, respectively. Two males per litter were examined for all outcomes except serum hormones (5-7 males from different litters). Column 1 shows results of standard linear ANOVAs using PROC GLM in SAS (controlling for litter membership). Column 2 gives P values for comparison of two nested linear regression models, with and without a [log(dose)]2 term using the R Statistical System. A significant result (indicated in bold) provides evidence that a U or inverted-U curve fits the data better than a simple linear fit, and indicates a non-monotonic dose–response function. Males were evaluated when 4 to 5 months old unless otherwise indicated. For details about the statistics, see Supplemental Materials from Angle et al.28