Skip to main content
. 2015 May 13;3:2050312115585041. doi: 10.1177/2050312115585041

Table 2.

Fit statistics for exploratory factor analyses (ESEM) and CFA of pre-test and post-test heiQ data separately.

Model χWLSMV2 d.f. p CFI TLI RMSEA (90% CI)
ESEM Pre-test 6 Factors 5616.48 555 <0.0000 0.961 0.945 0.053 (0.52–0.54)
ESEM Pre-test 7 Factors 3776.87 521 <0.0000 0.975 0.962 0.044 (0.43–0.45)
ESEM Pre-test 8 Factors 2602.28 488 <0.0000 0.984 0.974 0.037 (0.035–0.038)
ESEM Post-test 6 Factors 4759.79 555 <0.0000 0.969 0.956 0.048 (0.47–0.50)
ESEM Post-test 7 Factors 3086.12 521 <0.0000 0.981 0.971 0.039 (0.38–0.40)
ESEM Post-test 8 Factors 2357.36 488 <0.0000 0.986 0.978 0.034 (0.033–0.036)
CFA Pre-test 8 Factors 8391.71 712 <0.0000 0.940 0.935 0.058 (0.057–0.059)
CFA Post-test 8 Factors 6935.57 712 <0.0000 0.953 0.949 0.052 (0.051–0.053)

ESEM: exploratory structural equation modelling; CFA: confirmatory factor analysis; heiQ: Health Education Impact Questionnaire; d.f.: degrees of freedom; CFI: comparative fit index; TLI: Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA: root mean square error of approximation; CI: confidence interval.