Duggal 1998.
Methods | Parallel‐group randomized trial, conducted in Canada. Study dates not reported. | |
Participants | 263 women undergoing spinal anaesthesia for elective Caesarean delivery. Excluded: women with a history of hyperemesis gravidarum or if they had received antiemetic medication during the 48 h before surgery. 8 women excluded for failing to wear wristbands for 10 hours, 3 had received prophylactic antiemetics, and 8 were not given standard combination of intrathecal drugs (total 19 withdrawals). | |
Interventions | Acupressure wristbands were applied to both wrists just before induction of spinal anaesthesia and worn for 10 hours (n = 122). Sham acupressure wristbands were applied at P6 acupoint (but stud missing) on both wrists just before induction of spinal anaesthesia and worn for 10 hours (n = 122). |
|
Outcomes | Nausea (0 ‐ 10 h), vomiting (0 ‐ 10 h), risk of rescue antiemetic (type of drug not given), side effects of acupressure. Patients recorded outcome measures on a questionnaire. | |
Notes | Adverse effects of acupressure wristbands: tightness, swollen hands, problems with infusion, itching wrists. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting reported. Funding by a grant from the BC Medical Services Foundation. Wristbands were donated by Sea Band UK Ltd. No details of any declarations of interest among the authors. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "A table of random numbers was used to allocate patients to one of two groups". |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information. |
Blinding of patients (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "The nature of the bands was therefore unknown to the patient, anaesthetist and investigators for the duration of the study". |
Blinding of healthcare providers (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "The nature of the bands was therefore unknown to the patient, anaesthetist and investigators for the duration of the study". |
Blinding of outcome assessor (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "The nature of the bands was therefore unknown to the patient, anaesthetist and investigators for the duration of the study". |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Reasons for withdrawals were given. No missing data reported for the 244 participants analysed. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All expected outcomes reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | Baseline characteristics were comparable. "Demographic analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between subjects in the two groups". |