Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jul 12;139(3):506–512. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.07.015

Table 3.

Significance of each variable included in the mixed effects Cox models.

Clinical model Treatment-adjusted model

Covariates Rank AIC LRT P-value Covariates Ran
k
AIC LRT P-value
Hospital 1 130132 65.61 <0.0001 Hospital 1 129913.1 80.4 <0.0001
Stage 2 129653.44 820.99 <0.0001 Stage 2 129068.52 682.85 <0.0001
Year 3 129253.6 425.15 <0.0001 Year 3 128732.12 356.45 <0.0001
Age 4 128988.4 151.94 <0.0001 Brachytherapy 4 128670.9 281.23 <0.0001
Race 5 128926.02 89.55 <0.0001 Chemotherapy 5 128536.3 148.64 <0.0001
Insurance status 6 128911.56 77.1 <0.0001 Race 6 128473.24 89.57 <0.0001
Histology 7 128890.16 51.7 <0.0001 Age 7 128461.02 77.36 <0.0001
Grade 8 128888.34 49.88 <0.0001 Grade 8 128439.54 53.88 <0.0001
Hospital volume 9 128849.1 6.65 0.01 Insurance status 9 128436.56 54.89 <0.0001
Hospital type 10 128841.56 1.11 0.57 Histology 10 128431.18 45.51 <0.0001
Hospital region 11 128840.86 2.41 0.49 Hospital volume 11 128391 1.32 0.25
Hospital type 12 128388.38 0.71 0.70
Hospital Region 13 128386.08 0.41 0.94

AIC, Alkaike information criterion. LRT, likelihood ratio test.

The null model has an AIC of 114468.18. AIC was calculated as minus twice log likelihood plus 2 df. The LRT compares the full model (including all variables) with a reduced model omitting 1 variable at a time. The higher the AIC, the greater importance of the omitted variable.