Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Jul 8;60:14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.06.019

Table 3.

Adjusted intervention effects on older at-risk drinkers’ health and health-related quality of life (HRQL)

Health and HRQL outcomes 6 month intervention effect (95% CI) 12 month intervention effect (95% CI)
Physical Component Score (PCS)
 Control for baseline PCS only 0.25 (−0.67, 1.17) −0.13 (−0.94,0.68)
  N 1,066 1,042
 Control for baseline PCS, risk factors, and demographics 0.33 (−0.51, 1.17) 0.06 (−0.61, 0.72)
  N 1,011 990

Mental Component Score (MCS)
 Control for baseline MCS only 0.56** (0.06, 1.06) 0.15 (−0.60, 0.90)
  N 1,066 1,042
 Control for baseline MCS, risk factors, and demographics 0.58* (−0.06, 1.21) 0.16 (−0.56, 0.88)
  N 1,011 990

SF-6D
 Control for baseline SF-6D only 0.01*** (0.01, 0.01) 0.01 (−0.01, 0.01)
  N 1,070 1,047
 Control for baseline SF-6D, risk factors, and demographics 0.01*** (0.01, 0.02) 0.01** (0.01, 0.01)
  N 1,015 995

Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
 Control for baseline MCS only 0.07 (−0.05, 0.20)
  N 1,002
 Control for baseline MCS, risk factors, and demographics 0.14** (0.01, 0.26)
  N 953

Notes:

*

indicates p<0.10,

**

p<0.05,

***

p<0.01.

1

The Geriatric Depression Scale was reverse coded so that higher values indicated fewer depressive symptoms.

Regression models controlled for either: 1) only the baseline value of the outcome, or 2) risk factors and demographic covariates listed in Table 1, as well as the baseline value of the dependent variable (with the exception of the Geriatric Depression Scale regression, which controlled for baseline MCS score instead).