Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Jun 15;12(2):218–246. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.06.001

Table 6.

Dichotomous moderator analysis of medication adherence effect size: Intervention characteristics

Moderator k Effect size Standard error Qbetween p (Qbetween)
Intervention delivery medium 3.845 .050
 Face to-face 29 0.411 0.093
 Mediated delivery (e.g., telephone, mail) 11 0.182 0.071

Behaviors targeted with intervention 0.1 .752
 Medication adherence exclusively targeted 24 0.318 0.081
 Multiple behaviors including medication adherence 16 0.282 0.091

Motivational interviewing theory/approach 2.142 .143
 Present   9 0.186 0.074
 Absent 31 0.336 0.070

Social Cognitive Theory 3.590 .058
 Present   6 0.086 0.126
 Absent 34 0.356 0.067

Subjects self-monitoring adherence behavior 0.651 .420
 Present   8 0.382 0.105
 Absent 32 0.283 0.065

Subjects self-monitoring signs of disease 0.943 .331
 Present   5 0.213 0.073
 Absent 35 0.309 0.066

Strategies to manage/reduce medication side effects 0.026 .873
 Present   5 0.255 0.265
 Absent 35 0.299 0.060

Prompts or cues to administer medications 4.481 .034
 Present 10 0.497 0.107
 Absent 30 0.234 0.063

Rewards or consequences for increased adherence 0.189 .663
 Present   6 0.365 0.165
 Absent 34 0.288 0.062

Habit assessment and linkage for adherence 7.237 .007
 Present 12 0.574 0.116
 Absent 28 0.222 0.061

Adherence goal setting 3.024 .082
 Present 13 0.121 0.121
 Absent 27 0.363 0.068

Improve communication between patients and providers 0.943 .332
 Present   8 0.204 0.107
 Absent 32 0.326 0.066

Feedback to patients about adherence levels   0 .992
 Present 10 0.303 0.143
 Absent 30 0.305 0.065

k denotes number of comparisons. Effect size is standardized mean difference. Q is a conventional heterogeneity statistic.