Table 3.

Influence of resident Wolbachia on the survival and mobility of P. dilatatus infected with wVulC.

	Day 60 PI			Day 75 PI			Day 105 PI
	df	Deviance	p	df	Deviance	p	df	Deviance	p
Comparisons between dilatatus A, dilatatus A-wCon, and dilatatus A-wDil
Mobility
Bacterial injection	1	15.245	<0.001	1	26.701	<0.001	1	18.135	<0.001
Wolbachia status	2	3.535	0.171	2	6.635	0.036	2	6.080	0.048
Survival
Bacterial injection	1	0.604	0.436	1	1.285	0.257	1	42.591	<0.001
Wolbachia status	2	0.993	0.608	2	1.576	0.448	2	9.218	0.01
Comparisons between dilatatus A-wCon and dilatatus A-wDil
Mobility
Bacterial injection	1	11.681	0.001	1	20.181	<0.001	1	18.138	<0.001
Wolbachia status	1	1.612	0.204	1	5.724	0.017	1	6.080	0.014
Survival
Bacterial injection	1	0.214	0.643	1	3.413	0.064	1	32.185	<0.001
Wolbachia status	1	2.078	0.149	1	0.149	0.245	1	8.475	0.004

Porcellio dilatatus males were injected with invasive wVulC Wolbachia strain and their survival as well as their mobility was recorded on the days 60, 75, and 105 PI. A mixed effects linear model with random block effect was used to analyze mobility data. A mixed effects Cox proportional hazards model was fitted using the survival data of the lineages to estimate the effects of the treatment and the Wolbachia status. For both models, first a global model with all of the lineages (symbiotic dilatatus A-wCon, dilatatus A-wDil and asymbiotic dilatatus A) was fitted, then further analysis was made to clarify the differences between symbiotic dilatatus A-wCon and dilatatus A-wDil lineages with help of a sub-model. In bold, statistically significant values (p < 0.05).