Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 16;6:1104. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01104

Table 2.

Comparison between transcriptomic and proteomic data.

atnp01 (%) atnp02 (%) Comparisons atnp01/atnp02 (%)
% Concurrent 58.97 56.41 70.51
% Non-concurrent High transcript low protein 20.51 15.38 29.49
Low transcript high protein 20.51 28.21