Table 4.
P-values of all the pairwise comparison of the classes (rows) of Table 3.
| C | L | Q | Ω | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR | EMC | LMC | AD | CR | EMC | LMC | AD | CR | EMC | LMC | AD | CR | EMC | LMC | AD | |
| CR | 1 | 0.877 | 0.832 | 0.012 | 1 | 0.894 | 0.711 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.972 | 0.986 | 0.003 | 1 | 0.909 | 0.837 | 0.000 |
| EMCI | 0.877 | 1 | 0.978 | 0.007 | 0.894 | 1 | 0.995 | 0.000 | 0.972 | 1 | 0.998 | 0.001 | 0.909 | 1 | 0.999 | 0.001 |
| LCMI | 0.832 | 0.978 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.711 | 0.995 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.986 | 0.998 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.837 | 0.999 | 1 | 0.000 |
| AD | 0.012 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 1 |
| BC | EBC | CF | #Nodes | |||||||||||||
| CR | 1 | 0.328 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 1 | 0.626 | 0.011 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.003 | 0.012 | 0.001 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.009 | 0.000 |
| EMCI | 0.328 | 1 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.626 | 1 | 0.005 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 1 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.792 | 0.001 |
| LCMI | 0.010 | 0.006 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.011 | 0.005 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.012 | 0.004 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.009 | 0.792 | 1 | 0.000 |
| AD | 0.012 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 1 |
The non-parametric Wilcoxon ranksum test with Bonferroni correction was used in all comparisons (bold ones are significant). C, indicates the clustering coefficient; L, the characteristic path length; Q, the modularity; Ω, the average node strength; BC, the betweenness centrality; EBC, the edge betweenness centrality; CF, the proposed measure called Compression Flow; and #Nodes represents the number of nodes.