Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 11;5(12):e007568. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007568

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis

Study Country Study design Sample size Age at baseline Percentage male Knee OA cases Follow-up (year) Covariates in fully adjusted model NOS score
Grotle et al17 Norway Cohort 1854 24–76 43.7% 114 10.0 Age, gender, work type, leisure time activities 7
Hart et al18 UK Cohort 715 54.1 0 95 4.0 Hysterectomy, ERT, smoking, physical activity, knee pain and social class 6
Cooper et al19 UK Cohort 346 >55.0 26.3 45 5.1 Age and sex 7
Reijman et al20 Netherlands Cohort 1372 >55.0 75 6.6 Age, sex and follow-up time 8
Järvholm et al21 Sweden Cohort 320 192 15–67 100% 502 12.0 Age and smoking 8
Niu et al22 USA Cohort 2623 62.4 40% 163 2.5 Age, gender, race, bone mineral density and knee injury 7
Liu et al23 UK Cohort 490 532 50–69 0 974 2.9 Age, region of recruitment, deprivation index 8
Wang et al24 Australia Cohort 41 528 25–75 41.1% 541 5.0 Age, gender, country of birth and education 8
Toivanen et al25 Finland Cohort 823 >30 44.8% 94 22.0 Age, gender 9
Lohmander et al8 Sweden Cohort 27 960 45–73 39.4% 471 11.0 Age, gender, smoking and physical activity 9
Felson et al26 USA Cohort 598 63.7 36.3% 93 8.0 Age, gender, smoking, physical activity, knee injury and weight change 7
Hochberg et al27 USA Cohort 437 >20 68.2% 4.0 Age, gender and smoking 6
Manninen et al28 Finland Cohort 6647 40–64 126 10.0 None 7
Shiozaki et al29 Japan Cohort 1191 40–65 0 14.0 Physical exercise and knee injury 7

ERT, estrogen replacement therapy; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale; OA, osteoarthritis.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure