Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 15;49(23):1504–1509. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095100

Table 1.

Study details

Author (year) Study design Country where the study was performed Primary recruitment criteria (ie, tendon pain/structure or lipid level) Was an upper limb (UL) or lower limb (LL) tendon assessed Was tendon structure and/or tendon pain assessed
Abate (2014) Cross-sectional study Italy Neither—referred for LL disease UL Structure
Abboud (2010) Case–control study USA Tendon structure UL Structure
Beri (2009) Case–control study USA Tendon structure Both Structure
Descamps (2001) Case–control study Belgium Lipid levels LL Structure
Durrington (1982) Case–control study UK Lipid levels LL Structure
Gaida (2009) Case–control study Australia/Sweden Tendon pain LL Both
Gattereau (1973) Case–control study Canada Lipid levels LL Structure
Junyent (2005) Case–control study Spain Lipid levels LL Structure
Klemp (1993) Case–control study South Africa Lipid levels Both Both
Kwak (2013) Case–control study Korea Lipid levels LL Structure
Longo (2010) Case–control study UK Tendon structure Both Both
Mabuchi (1977) Case–control study Japan Lipid levels LL Structure
Mabuchi (1978) Case–control study Japan Lipid levels LL Structure
Ozgurtas (2003) Case–control study Turkey Tendon structure LL Structure
Rechardt (2013) Cross-sectional study Finland Tendon pain UL Pain
Tsouli (2009) Case–control study Greece Lipid levels LL Structure
Yuzawa (1989) Case–control study Japan Lipid levels LL Structure