Table 2.

Technical expert panel (TEP) ratings of included QI domains and per cent criterion met

#	Domain	Panel item	Mean rating*	% Criterion met†
1	Organisational motivation	Description of the organisational problem/reason or motivation for intervention	2.78	64
2	Intervention rationale	Description of rationale linking the intervention to expected effects	2.78	67
3	Intervention	Description of specific changes in healthcare delivery organisation/structure	3.00	93
4	Organisational characteristics	Description of organisational demographics and basic characteristics	2.89	89
5	Implementation	Description of the approach to designing and/or introducing organisational changes	2.89	92
6	Study design	Description of study design	2.89	44
7	Comparator	n/a	n/a	67
8	Data source	n/a	n/a	67
9	Timing	Description of timing (intervention components introduction and evaluation)	2.78	56
10	Adherence/fidelity	Description of intervention adherence/fidelity	2.78	47
11	Health outcomes	Description of health-related outcomes	2.33	58
12	Organisational readiness	Description of organisational readiness for the studied intervention	2.00	84
13	Penetration/reach	Description of intervention penetration/reach	2.56	85
14	Sustainability	Description of potential for intervention maintenance or sustainability	2.22	83
15	Spread	Description of ability to be spread or replicated	2.11	89
16	Limitations	Quality of the interpretation of findings	2.56	64

*Members (N=9) of an international TEP assessed independently whether the domain should (score=3), should maybe (score=2) or should not (score=1) be part of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS). The respondents were instructed that the goal was to identify a minimum number of core domains; n/a: not applicable, the items were developed as a response to panel input.

†Percentage of publications meeting the criterion in psychometric evaluation sample (total N=54 publications, number of observations ranged from 18 to 45 as only the final item version was included in the analysis).