Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar;40(1):21–26.

Table 3.

Ranked filter percent removal of suspended flowing GMEs at 4.5 L/min, 32°C, and 20% hematocrit.

At 40- to 45-μm GME size
At 20- to 25-μm GME size
Filter Percent Removal Rank* Significance Percent Removal Rank* Significance
Cobe 21 0.995 1 NS 0.962 1 NS
LG-6 40 0.988 1 NS 0.964 1 NS
Gish 25 0.985 1 NS 0.964 1 NS
Affinity 20 0.982 1 NS 0.899 1 0.039§
Dideco 27 0.971 1 <0.001 0.818 1 NS
Cobe 43 0.785 2 NS 0.739 2 NS§
Affinity 38 0.769 2 NS 0.691 2 NS
Capiox 37 0.750 2 NS 0.606 2 <0.001**
Capiox 40 0.750 2 NS 0.724 2 NS
Gish 40 0.721 2 <0.001 0.638 2 NS

NS, no significant difference by ANOVA at p < .05.

*

Filters ranked the same are not significantly different.

Compared to the filter group ranked next and lower.

Compared to Cobe 43 only and the rank 1 group.

§

Affinity 20 is significantly greater than Cobe 43 group.

The Dideco 27 is NS to the Cobe 43 and Affinity 38.

**

Capiox 37 is significantly lower than the Dideco 27 but NS to the Cobe 43.