Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 15;3:48. doi: 10.1186/s40337-015-0087-6

Table 6.

Kruskal-Wallis Test with pairwise comparisons for the girl sample divided into three groups (Group 0 = 0 “yes”-answers to the SCOFF scale, Group 1 = 1 “yes” answer to the SCOFF-scale and Group 2 = 2 or more “yes” answers to the SCOFF scale)

Girl Sample
Kruskal –Wallis Test N Mdn M(SD) Pairwise comparisons z*** ES
EDE-Q Total H(2) = 174.74 *** 0 = 330 .41 .65(.68) 0–1 −6.15 .28
1 = 137 1.09 1.32(1.10) 0–2+ −12.88 .63
2 = 92 2.89 2.78(1.28) 1–2 + −6.63 .44
559
EDE-Q Restraint H(2) = 130.19*** 0 = 361 .20 .48(.74) 0–1 −4.94 .22
1 = 155 .40 .96(1.20) 0–2+ −11.21 .52
2 + = 103 1.90 2.25(1.68) 1–2 + −6.12 .38
619
EDE-Q Eating concern H(2) = 188.72*** 0 = 364 .00 .25(.49) 0–1 −6.73 .30
1 = 154 .40 .76(.91) 0–2+ −13.29 .62
2 + = 99 2.0 1.96(1.39) 1–2 + −6.67 .42
617
EDE-Q Weight concern H(2) = 170.85*** 0 = 355 .40 .81(.96) 0–1 −6.66 .30
1 = 154 1.40 1.72(1.44) 0–2+ −12.58 .59
2 + = 98 3.20 3.11(1.45) 1–2 + −6.14 .39
607
EDE-Q Shape concern H(2) = 167.74*** 0 = 352 .75 1.09(1.05) 0–1 −6.06 .27
1 = 145 1.63 2.03(1.55) 0–2+ −12.61 .59
2 + = 98 4.13 3.72(1.54) 1–2 + −6.44 .41
595

*** p = < .0001