Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;133(12):1408–1414. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.3556

Table 3. OR for myopia and high myopia in UK biobank participants by birth order after adjusting for full set of potential confounders.

Model 1a
Model 2b
Model 3c
OR 95%CI P OR 95%CI P OR 95%CI P
MYOPIA (N=25,278)
 First vs. second born 1.10 (1.04 to 1.17) 1.70E-03 1.08 (1.01 to 1.15) 1.60E-02 1.14 (1.07 to 1.21) 6.10E-05
 First vs. third born 1.09 (1.00 to 1.19) 6.00E-02 1.04 (0.95 to 1.14) 3.60E-01 1.15 (1.05 to 1.27) 3.20E-03
 First vs. fourth born or higher 1.16 (1.02 to 1.30) 1.90E-02 1.02 (0.90 to 1.15) 7.50E-01 1.17 (1.03 to 1.34) 1.80E-02
HIGH MYOPIA (N=18,047 d )
 First vs. second born 1.18 (1.03 to 1.36) 2.10E-02 1.14 (0.99 to 1.31) 7.30E-02 1.23 (1.06 to 1.43) 5.10E-03
 First vs. third born 1.18 (0.96 to 1.44) 1.20E-01 1.11 (0.90 to 1.36) 3.30E-01 1.29 (1.04 to 1.60) 2.20E-02
 First vs. fourth born or higher 0.93 (0.72 to 1.19) 5.50E-01 0.77 (0.60 to 1.00) 4.70E-02 0.95 (0.73 to 1.25) 7.40E-01
a

Model 1; Adjusted for age and sex only.

b

Model 2; Adjusted for age, sex and highest educational qualification.

c

Model 3; Adjusted for age, sex, highest educational qualification, Townsend Deprivation Index, current time spent outdoors, birth weight and maternal age.

d

Sample size reduced since participants with mild/moderate myopia were excluded.