Table 1.
Phenotypic variation, explanation and broad-sense heritability of each trait in the indica panel
| Trait a | Environment b | Mean ± S.E c | Range | R Q 2 (%) d | H B 2 (%) e |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TN | LS | 12.47 ± 0.16 | 4.67 ~ 26.50 | 30.78 | 80.08 |
| HZ | 13.29 ± 0.18 | 5.75 ~ 32.00 | 24.49 | ||
| TA | LS | 18.24 ± 0.28 | 8.00 ~ 35.00 | 11.06 | 74.25 |
| HZ | 16.40 ± 0.19 | 8.67 ~ 31.40 | 11.34 | ||
| PH | LS | 110.91 ± 1.20 | 54.50 ~ 199.50 | 52.93 | 77.36 |
| HZ | 134.47 ± 1.45 | 74.60 ~ 212.60 | 57.53 | ||
| FLL | LS | 27.23 ± 0.22 | 14.00 ~ 40.60 | 24.77 | 36.49 |
| HZ | 39.13 ± 0.34 | 21.88 ~ 68.25 | 23.21 | ||
| FLW | LS | 1.45 ± 0.01 | 0.90 ~ 2.14 | 19.19 | 75.66 |
| HZ | 1.61 ± 0.01 | 1.03 ~ 2.43 | 14.52 | ||
| FLLW | LS | 19.18 ± 0.19 | 9.42 ~ 35.75 | 25.20 | 61.53 |
| HZ | 24.74 ± 0.26 | 12.32 ~ 43.45 | 21.07 | ||
| FLA | LS | 1.89 ± 0.06 | 1 ~ 7 | 10.57 | 62.67 |
| HZ | 2.69 ± 0.08 | 1 ~ 7 | 37.03 | ||
| PN | LS | 9.29 ± 0.12 | 4.83 ~ 22.33 | 29.24 | 79.37 |
| HZ | 9.13 ± 0.12 | 4.60 ~ 27.20 | 15.64 | ||
| PT | LS | 2.21 ± 0.03 | 1 ~ 5 | 9.74 | 72.15 |
| HZ | 2.58 ± 0.04 | 1 ~ 5 | 24.26 | ||
| PL | LS | 22.38 ± 0.11 | 17.20 ~ 30.10 | 18.95 | 49.52 |
| HZ | 25.93 ± 0.11 | 18.42 ~ 32.83 | 14.97 | ||
| PC | LS | - | 0 ~ 1 | 17.26 | 99.61 |
| HZ | - | 0 ~ 1 | 14.69 | ||
| HC | LS | - | 0 ~ 1 | 8.16 | 88.46 |
| HZ | - | 0 ~ 1 | 5.70 | ||
| Average | 21.76 | 71.43 |
a TN tiller number, TA tiller angle, PH plant height, FLL flag leaf length, FLW flag leaf width, FLLW the ratio of flag leaf length and flag leaf width, FLA flag leaf angle, PN panicle number, PT panicle type, PL panicle length, PC pericarp color, HC hull color; b LS Lingshui, HZ Hangzhou; c S.E standard error; d R 2Q (%), Percentage of phenotypic variation explained by population structure estimated by Structure; e H 2B (%), Broad-sense heritability; −, No data