Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 16.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2015 Mar 26;48(5):599–608. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.12.005

Table 2.

Effectiveness of Programs to Increase High School Completion,a for High-Risk, Pregnant, or Parent Students

Intervention type Adjustedb ORs (95% CI) Comparison (control) high school completion rate (%) Additional high school completion percentage points attributable to intervention (number of study arms)
Vocational training 2.64 (2.12, 3.28) 70.3 15.9 (51)
Alternative schooling 1.94 (1.34, 2.82) 53.8 15.5 (30)
Social–emotional skills training 2.35 (1.69, 3.28) 72.3 13.7 (12)
College-oriented programming 2.46 (1.70, 3.57) 80.9 10.4 (25)
Mentoring and counseling 2.62 (1.97, 3.47) 83.7 9.4 (27)
Supplemental academic services 2.06 (1.50, 2.81) 81.0 8.8 (28)
School and class restructuring 2.23 (1.89, 2.64) 83.6 8.3 (105)
Multiservice packages 1.87 (1.49, 2.36) 81.6 7.7 (23)
1.61 (1.41, 1.83)c 32.0 11.0 (47)
Attendance monitoring and contingencies 1.46 (1.30, 1.63) 73.4 6.7 (26)
1.99 (1.65, 2.40)c 18.0 12.4 (39)
Community service 3.53 (1.90, 6.54) 91.0 6.3 (24)
Case management 2.14 (1.75, 2.62) 92.9 3.6 (17)
a

As shown in review by Wilson et al.21

b

Adjusted for study methods, participant characteristics, and implementation quality.

c

Target population was pregnant and parent students.