Table 2.
Reviewed in 2011 | Confirmed in Recent Studies? | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Effect Size | Evidence | Effect Size | Evidence | ||||
Source | Strength | Source | Strength | ||||
Activity Interests & Participation | large | Natural Expt Amniotic T | +++ ++ |
large | Natural Expt Amniotic T | +++ --- |
|
Gender Identity | small | Natural Expt | +++ | small | Natural Expt | +++ | |
Sexual Orientation | moderate | Natural Expt | +++ | Natural Expt | --- | ||
Spatial Abilities | small-moderate | Natural Expt OS twins |
++ + |
small-moderate | Natural Expt OS Twins Amniotic T |
+++ ++ + |
|
Psychopathology: | |||||||
“Autistic” Traits | moderate | Natural Expt Amniotic T |
+ + |
large | Amniotic T | + | |
Autism Diagnosis | no effect | Natural Expt | + | ||||
Substance Use | small | OS Twins | + | ||||
Disordered Eating | small-moderate | OS Twins | + |
Modified from [4].
Source (of evidence): Natural Expt: Natural experiments (e.g., CAH); Amniotic T: Typical samples with direct measure of testosterone in amniotic fluid; OS Twins: Typical samples of opposite versus same-sex twins
Strength (of evidence), based on number of studies and ability to infer causation about androgen from design (e.g., more weight given to data from natural experiments than twins): + weak; ++ moderate; +++ strong; --- insufficient new evidence