Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 16.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Biol. 2014 Jun 23;393(1):137–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.06.012

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Nkx2.2 represses Arx expression. A) Nkx2.2, FoxA2+Nkx2.2 or FoxA2 + Nkx2.2HD (homeodomain only) electroporation into the developing chick spinal cord. Nkx2.2 alone was able to induce FoxA2, but not Arx. The ability of FoxA2 to induce Arx is suppressed by forced expression of Nkx2.2 but not by the homeodomain only mutant form of Nkx2.2 (Nkx2.2HD). B) SmoM2 or ΔN-Gli3 co-electroporation with FoxA2 into the developing chick spinal cord. SmoM2 and ΔN-Gli3 failed to suppress the ability of FoxA2 to induce expression of Arx. Scale bars in upper left panel of A and B are 50 μm.