Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 6;42(1):34–44. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv088

Table 1.

Author(s), Number of Items Analyzed, Number of Factors Retained and Variance Explained, Form and Response Format, Sample Size, and Description for Exploratory Factor-Analytic Studies (n = 12)

Study Items Analyzed Factors (Variance Explained) Form N Sample Description
Full-scale
Brenner et al38 42 3 (31.50%) English & French Random half of 2275 Canadian general population (49.5% male; Mean age = 26)
Fonseca-Pedrero et al39 42 3b (34.57%) Spanish 660 Spanish university students (N = 660; 29.5% male; Mean age = 20.3)
Verdoux et al36 42 3 (31.30%) French 571 French undergraduate female students (Mean age = 19.8)
Positive dimension
Armando et al41 18a 4 (51.50%) English & Italian 1777 Australian high school students (N=848; 47% male; Mean age = 15) and Italian university students (N=929; 23.4% male; Mean age = 21)
Armando et al42 20 4 (51.00%) Italian 997 Italian university students (23.8% male; Mean age = 21)
Barragan et al43 20 4 (48.00%) Spanish 777 Spanish high school students (49.1% male; Mean age = 14.4)
Stefanis et al44 20 4 (N.A.) Greek 3500 Greek adolescents (45% male; Mean age = 19)
Therman et al40 20 5 (62.80%) Swedish P&P; O 31822 Swedish women (Mean age = 51.4)
Wigman et al47 20 5 (60.30%) Language not specified 5422 Adolescents in Europe & North America (50% male; Mean age = 14.0)
Yung et al46 20 3 (52.44%) English 140 Australian help-seeking youth with a nonpsychotic psychiatric problem (42% male; Mean age = 17.67)
Yung et al45 20 4 (N.A.) English 875 Australian high school students (46.9% male)
Negative dimension
Barragan et al43 14 3 (43.00%) Spanish 777 Spanish high school students (49.1% male; Mean age = 14.4)
Ziermans48 14 3 (54.00%) Swedish 1012 Swedish adolescents and young adults (Mean age = 24.4)

Note: P&P, Pencil & Paper; O, Online.

aThe authors excluded items 15 and 20 from factor analysis because these items reportedly “related more closely to cultural background and age than to psychopathology.”

bAuthors reported that a tetradimensional solution was implicated for extraction, but only 2 factors loaded on the fourth factor. Hence, a tridimensional solution was preferred.