Table 2.
Study | Form | Best Fitting Model | Goodness-of-fit indices | N | Sample Description | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRMRa | TLIb | CFIc | RMSEAd | |||||
Full scale | ||||||||
Original validation: Stefanis et al14 | Greek CAPE-40 | 3 correlated factors | — | — | — | 0.045 | 932 | Greek young men undergoing compulsory military service aged 18–24 |
Brenner et al38 | English & French | 3 correlated factors, with 19 items deleted | — | — | 0.739 | — | Random half of 2275 | Canadian general population (49.5% male; Mean age = 26) |
Fonseca-Pedrero et al39 | Spanish | 3 correlated factors | 1.803 | 0.885 | 0.825 | 0.079 | 660 | Spanish university students (29.5% male; Mean age = 20.3) |
Vleeschouwer et al37 | Dutch P&P; O | 3 correlated factors with 2 residual correlations | — | P&P: 0.95 O: 0.94 | P&P: 0.86 O: 0.80 | P&P/O: 0.05 | P&P: 796; O: 21590 | Dutch general population (38.5% male; Mean age = 41.0) |
Positive dimension | ||||||||
Capra et al49 | English | 3 correlated factors, with 5 items deleted | — | 0.938 | 0.976 | 0.027 | 1610 | Australian university students (24% male; Mean age = 22.1) |
Wigman et al67 | English | 5 correlated factors | — | — | 0.92 | 0.038 | 2230 | Dutch adolescents in the general population (49% male; Mean age = 11.1) |
Wigman et al50 | Language not specified | 5 correlated factors (across T1, T2, T3) | — | — | T1: 0.959 T2: 0.987 T3: 0.990 | T1: 0.030 T2: 0.019 T3: 0.016 | 566 | Caucasian Belgian women (Mean age = 27.3) |
Ziermans48 | Swedish | 4 correlated factors, allowing error terms of 3 item pairs to correlate | — | — | 0.93 | 0.04 | 1012 | Swedish adolescents and young adults (Mean age = 24.4) |
Note: Figures in bold denote acceptable values for goodness of fit indices.
aSRMR, Standardized root mean square residual; it is generally established that SRMR should be inferior to 0.08 for a good fit of the model data.
bTLI, Tucker-Lewis Index; it is generally established that TLI should be superior to 0.95 for a good fit of the model data.
cCFI, Comparative fit index; it is generally established that CFI should be superior to 0.95 for a good fit of the model data.
dRMSEA, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; it is generally established that RMSEA should be inferior to 0.06 for a good fit of the model data.