Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 17;5:18383. doi: 10.1038/srep18383

Table 1. Ranges sampled for the sensitivity and stochastic simulations.

Case Rock Pressure Forcing Depth (m) Matrix ϕm S Matrix km (m2) δf,max (mm) Chimney ϕc Chimney kc (m2)
Sens. Tuff and Granite Denver, Jan. 250 0.01–0.4 0.36* 0.01–0.9 0.07 10−20–10−13 1.5 × 1014 0.8–30.9 0.4 3.7 × 1012
MC1 Granite Denver, Jan. 125, 250, 390 0.001–0.01 0.01–0.5 10−19–10−14 0.8–3 0.4–0.5 10−12–10−10
MC2 Tuff Denver, Jan. 125, 250, 390 0.05–0.4 0.5–0.9 10−18–10−13 0.8–3 0.4–0.5 10−12–10−10
MC3 Granite Denver, Jan. Anchorage, 250 0.05–0.4 0.5–0.9 10−18–10−13 0.8–3 0.4–0.5 10−12–10−10
MC4 Tuff Honolulu;Jan., June 250 0.05–0.4 0.5–0.9 10−18–10−13 0.8–3 0.4–0.5 10−12–10−10

*Base case parameters for the sensitivity study ranges (Sens.) are given in italics.