Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 15;6:10125. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10125

Table 3. Components of reproductive performance by mutual mate preference in giant pandas.

Variable Pairing type*
Test P
  P–P P–NP NP–P NP–NP    
Total mate pairings 12 4 7 3    
Total successful intromissions 83.3%a 50.0%a,b 57.1%a 0.0%b F3,22=2.97 0.05
Cubs produced 90.0%a 50.0%a,b 50.0%b 0.0%b F3,22=3.37 0.04
Mother reared cubs 88.8% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% F1,9=0.14 0.87
Mean number of cubs 1.4 (0.48) 1 1 (0.71) 0 F1,9=0.90 0.44
Mean male age (years) 12.3 (0.82) 13.3 (0.75) 11.4 (1.13) 8.7 (0.88) F3,22=0.90 0.45
Mean female age (years) 10.9 (1.16) 8.8 (1.43) 11 (1.69) 13.3 (0.67) F3,22=0.87 0.47
Mean male body mass (kg) 123.6 (2.01)a 111.5 (8.83)b 122.3 (3.37)a,b 96 (4.58)b F3,22=2.71 0.06
Mean female body mass (kg) 107 (6.95) 105.3 (11.05) 114.3 (3.24) 109.0 (3.51) F3,22=0.72 0.55

NP, non-preferred; P, preferred.

Numbers or mean values (s.e.), χ2 tests, and P values for various traits related to litter production by females that were mated with either a P or NP male. For each mating type, the female's preference of mate (P or NP) is given first, followed by the male's preference of mate. Different superscript letters (a,b) indicate significant differences (P<0.05) using a Tukey HD post hoc test.

*Parentheses are s.e.s.

Proportion scaled to the variable above (for example, total successful intromissions out of total mate pairings).