Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan;54(1):76–80. doi: 10.5414/CPP54076

Table 6. Pharmacodynamic assessments in study 1 (CTT116415).

Parameters Change from baseline in weighted mean (0 – 4 hours) Treatment comparison (test vs. reference)
FF/UMEC/VI vs. UMEC/VI FF/UMEC/VI vs. FF/VI FF/UMEC/VI vs. FF/UMEC
Maximum change from baseline in heart rate (bpm) Test 18.9 18.9 18.9
Reference 19.1 17.5 5.2
Difference (95% CI) –0.2 (–2.6 – 2.1) 1.4 (–0.9 – 3.7) 13.6 (11.3 – 15.9)
Derived heart rate (bpm) Test 6.18 6.18 6.18
Reference 6.08 5.97 0.69
Difference (95% CI) 0.10 (–1.16 – 1.35) 0.20 (–1.05 – 1.46) 5.49 (4.25 – 6.73)
Minimum change from baseline in serum potassium (mmol/L) Test –0.30 –0.30 –0.30
Reference –0.37 –0.36 –0.24
Difference (95% CI) 0.06 (–0.01 – 0.14) 0.05 (–0.02 – 0.13) –0.06 (–0.13 – 0.01)
Derived serum potassium (mmol/L) Test –0.123 –0.123 –0.123
Reference –0.174 –0.185 –0.062
Difference (95% CI) 0.051 (–0.022 – 0.124) 0.063 (–0.010 – 0.136) –0.061 (–0.133 – 0.012)
Maximum change from baseline in blood glucose (mmol/L) Test 0.544 0.544 0.544
Reference 0.507 0.452 0.061
Difference (95% CI) 0.037 (–0.044 – 0.110 0.117) 0.092 (0.011 – 0.172) 0.482 (0.403 – 0.562)
Derived blood glucose (mmol/L) Test –0.0211 –0.0211 –0.0211
Reference –0.0478 –0.0294 –0.1698
Difference (95% CI) 0.0267 (–0.0354 – 0.0889) 0.0083 (–0.0539 – 0.0705) 0.1486 (0.0871 – 0.2102)