Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 17;5:18312. doi: 10.1038/srep18312

Figure 2. Comparison of phenotypes and genotypes between parental eyΔ877/Δ1 strain and HR revertants.

Figure 2

(a) Lateral pictures of wild type (left), parental eyΔ877/Δ1 strain (centre), and HR revertant (right). The eyΔ877/Δ1 strain shows the deformed, non-spherical compound eye (ce) phenotype. The HR revertant shows the normal eye phenotype and wild type strain. Scale bar indicates 100 μm. (b) Schematic illustration of genomic PCR to check the integration of attP into the Dma-ey Δ1 allele. Black thick bar indicates the Dma-ey Δ1 allele. Primers are shown by arrows. The attP knock-in results in 240 bp long PCR products, whereas no modification gives 173 bp long PCR products. (c) Agarose gel electrophoresis of genomic PCR products using HR revertant strains. 1 and 2 are derived from co-injection of TALEN mRNAs and targeting plasmid, whereas 3 is derived from co-injection of TALEN mRNAs and ssODN with 80 nt homology. attP knocked-in HR revertants showed 240 bp PCR products, whereas parental eyΔ877/Δ1 strain showed 173 bp PCR products. M indicates the marker DNA.