Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 17;15:169. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0165-2

Table 3.

Baseline characteristics of participants who received an intervention for falling, comparing those who prioritized falling to those who did not

Priority for falling (n = 29) No priority for falling (n = 31) p
Sociodemographic variables
 Age 81.7 (±5.8) 80.9 (±6.4) 0.624
 Sex, female 21 (72.4 %) 20 (64.5 %) 0.511
 Born in the Netherlands 28 (96.6 %) 29 (93.5 %) 0.594
 Socioeconomic status
  -Low (≤1SD) 0 (0.0 %) 1 (3.2 %) 0.329
  -Intermediate 26 (89.7 %) 19 (61.3 %) 0.011
  -High (≥1SD) 3 (10.3 %) 11 (35.5 %) 0.012
 Highest level of education
  -Primary school or less 6 (20.7 %) 5 (16.1 %) 0.648
  -Secondary school 18 (62.1 %) 20 (64.5 %) 0.844
  -Tertiary school 5 (17.2 %) 6 (19.4 %) 0.833
 Living situation
  -Alone 17 (58.6 %) 18 (58.1 %) 0.965
  -With partner 10 (34.5 %) 12 (38.7 %) 0.734
  -Nursing home 2 (6.9 %) 1 (3.2 %) 0.514
 Marital status
  -Married 12 (41.4 %) 10 (32.3 %) 0.464
  -Divorced 2 (6.9 %) 4 (12.9 %) 0.438
  -Widowed 14 (48.3 %) 14 (45.2 %) 0.809
  -Unmarried 1 (3.4 %) 3 (9.7 %) 0.334
Falling and functioning
 Falls in the past year (≥1) 18 (62.1 %) 22 (71.0 %) 0.465
 Recurrent falls in the past year (≥2) 14 (50.0 %) 8 (26.7 %) 0.067
 Number of falls in the past year 3.0 [2.0; 4.0] 1.0 [1.0; 2.0] 0.004
 Severe fear-of-falling 17 (68.0 %) 15 (50.0 %) 0.178
 Use of a walking aid 17 (58.6 %) 18 (58.1 %) 0.965
Mental health and quality of life
 Self-reported health, less than good 14 (48.3 %) 18 (58.1 %) 0.448
 Quality of life, less than good 9 (31.0 %) 9 (29.0 %) 0.866
 EQ-5D Utility 0.8 (±0.1) 0.7 (±0.3) 0.260

Notes: data are mean (±SD), n (%) or median [IQR]