Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 9;3(12):apps.1500052. doi: 10.3732/apps.1500052

Table 2.

Statistical analysis of the 17 new microsatellite markers in four populationsa of Noccaea caerulescens in southern France.

All Avinières (n = 18) Saint Bresson (n = 22) Saint Hippolyte (n = 17) Coulet (n = 17)
Locus % amp A Ho He FISb A Ho He FISb A Ho He FISb A Ho He FISb A Ho He FISb
Ncpm09 100 16 0.563 0.699 0.108 8 0.722 0.794 0.091 5 0.545 0.598 0.089 10 0.823 0.893 0.078 6 0.353 0.46 0.232
Ncpm13 100 5 0.260 0.346 0.130 3 0.500 0.606 0.175 3 0.500 0.530 0.057 1 0.000 0.000 NA 4 0.176 0.224 0.213
Ncpm21 100 9 0.505 0.570 0.136 4 0.500 0.556 0.10 5 0.682 0.639 −0.068 3 0.412 0.588 0.300 3 0.294 0.449 0.344
Ncpm23 100 9 0.444 0.557 0.199 4 0.389 0.562 0.308 3 0.409 0.427 0.043 5 0.412 0.566 0.273 4 0.529 0.638 0.170
Ncpm31 98.6 9 0.493 0.694 0.396 6 0.667 0.771 0.136 4 0.111 0.645 0.828* 5 0.412 0.763 0.460 5 0.529 0.658 0.196
Ncpm07 98.6 8 0.485 0.606 0.210 6 0.833 0.725 −0.149 2 0.364 0.359 −0.012 3 0.062 0.383 0.837* 5 0.412 0.717 0.426
Ncpm14 100 5 0.254 0.405 0.357 3 0.500 0.650 0.231 2 0.091 0.089 −0.024 3 0.235 0.318 0.260 2 0.059 0.346 0.830
Ncpm19 100 11 0.544 0.647 0.130 5 0.722 0.730 0.011 4 0.591 0.639 0.075 2 0.187 0.425 0.559 7 0.706 0.774 0.088
Ncpm29 100 9 0.579 0.733 0.174 6 0.611 0.753 0.189 6 0.773 0.696 −0.110 7 0.529 0.833 0.364 5 0.529 0.746 0.291
Nc02 97.3 6 0.384 0.482 0.081 5 0.750 0.693 −0.042 4 0.273 0.290 0.060 1 0.000 0.000 NA 5 0.562 0.727 0.226
Nc03 98.6 4 0.296 0.467 0.316 3 0.350 0.292 −0.14 4 0.429 0.699 0.387 2 0.059 0.059 0.000 4 0.375 0.7 0.464
Nc04 100 9 0.528 0.618 0.125 6 0.700 0.778 0.143 4 0.318 0.290 −0.097 4 0.647 0.695 0.069 5 0.529 0.732 0.276
Nc06b 100 18 0.582 0.740 0.233 9 0.700 0.815 0.046 7 0.636 0.812 0.216 7 0.437 0.627 0.302 5 0.412 0.717 0.426
Nc07b 98.6 5 0.501 0.592 0.194 4 0.500 0.672 0.255 4 0.571 0.570 −0.002 4 0.471 0.498 0.055 3 0.294 0.57 0.484
Nc19 97.3 8 0.585 0.628 0.073 5 0.684 0.768 0.158 5 0.762 0.698 −0.092 5 0.529 0.686 0.228 4 0.562 0.575 0.022
Nc20 97.3 9 0.269 0.330 0.305 4 0.600 0.544 −0.021 6 0.619 0.664 0.068 1 0.000 0.000 NA 3 0.125 0.235 0.469
Nc22 100 6 0.347 0.522 0.305 2 0.150 0.157 −0.063 5 0.727 0.778 0.065 2 0.235 0.507 0.536 3 0.235 0.605 0.611

Note: % amp = percentage of successful amplification; A = number of alleles; FIS = intrapopulation fixation index; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; NA = not available.

a

Information on geographic locations and vouchers is provided in Appendix 1.

b

FIS values significantly different from zero after Bonferroni correction (P < 0.0006) are indicated with an asterisk.