Table 3. Mean results of simulated signal with added noise fittings for each method per T2 time for an ESP of 5ms (ETL = 32, FA = 140°).

Simulations were ran 1000 times.

Method 1			Method 2
T2(ms)	T2 fitted (ms)	dT2 (%)	T2 fitted (ms)	dT2 (%)	Offset
20	22.06 ± 0.37	10.29 ± 1.82	21.70 ± 0.41	8.49 ± 2.05	3.40
60	64.51 ± 0.63	7.51 ± 1.05	66.31 ± 1.93	10.51 ± 3.21	-9.61
100	107.32 ± 1.01	7.32 ± 1.01	113.19 ± 5.58	13.1 ± 5.559	-26.11
Method 3			Method 4
T2(ms)	T2 fitted (ms)	dT2 (%)	T2 fitteds (ms)	dT2 (%)	Offset
20	20.61 ± 0.45	3.05 ± 1.96	19.74 ± 0.5	1.30 ± 1.68	7.04
60	63.01 ± 0.66	5.01 ± 1.10	61.2 ± 1.943	2.05 ± 2.30	9.13
100	105.10 ± 1.05	5.10 ± 1.04	99.6 ± 4.884	0.36 ± 2.92	23.97