Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2015 Oct 26;290(51):30587–30595. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.687970

The High Efficiency of Photosystem I in the Green Alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Is Maintained after the Antenna Size Is Substantially Increased by the Association of Light-harvesting Complexes II*

Clotilde Le Quiniou 1, Bart van Oort 1, Bartlomiej Drop 1, Ivo H M van Stokkum 1, Roberta Croce 1,1
PMCID: PMC4683278  PMID: 26504081

Background: Photosystems acclimate to different light conditions modulating their antenna size.

Results: In PSI-LHCI-LHCII, energy transfer from LHCII to Photosystem I is relatively slow but still very efficient.

Conclusion: The association of LHCII to PSI increases its absorption cross section by ∼50%, maintaining ∼96% quantum efficiency.

Significance: The antenna size of PSI can be increased considerably without sacrificing its efficiency.

Keywords: Chlamydomonas, fluorescence, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), light-harvesting complex (antenna complex), photosynthesis, excitation energy transfer, Photosystem I, state transitions, light-harvesting, C. reinhardtii, time-resolved fluorescence

Abstract

Photosystems (PS) I and II activities depend on their light-harvesting capacity and trapping efficiency, which vary in different environmental conditions. For optimal functioning, these activities need to be balanced. This is achieved by redistribution of excitation energy between the two photosystems via the association and disassociation of light-harvesting complexes (LHC) II, in a process known as state transitions. Here we study the effect of LHCII binding to PSI on its absorption properties and trapping efficiency by comparing time-resolved fluorescence kinetics of PSI-LHCI and PSI-LHCI-LHCII complexes of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. PSI-LHCI-LHCII of C. reinhardtii is the largest PSI supercomplex isolated so far and contains seven Lhcbs, in addition to the PSI core and the nine Lhcas that compose PSI-LHCI, together binding ∼320 chlorophylls. The average decay time for PSI-LHCI-LHCII is ∼65 ps upon 400 nm excitation (15 ps slower than PSI-LHCI) and ∼78 ps upon 475 nm excitation (27 ps slower). The transfer of excitation energy from LHCII to PSI-LHCI occurs in ∼60 ps. This relatively slow transfer, as compared with that from LHCI to the PSI core, suggests loose connectivity between LHCII and PSI-LHCI. Despite the relatively slow transfer, the overall decay time of PSI-LHCI-LHCII remains fast enough to assure a 96% trapping efficiency, which is only 1.4% lower than that of PSI-LHCI, concomitant with an increase of the absorption cross section of 47%. This indicates that, at variance with PSII, the design of PSI allows for a large increase of its light-harvesting capacities.

Introduction

In eukaryotic organisms, the photosynthetic apparatus contains two main pigment-protein complexes, embedded in the thylakoid membrane, Photosystems (PS)2 I and II, that harvest light energy and convert it into chemical energy (1). The PS performances are largely determined by their capacities to harvest light and transfer excitation energy to the reaction center (RC) where charge separation occurs (2). To efficiently harvest light, PSI and PSII are equipped with two types of antennae. The inner antenna is composed of chlorophyll (Chl) a-binding complexes that together with the RC form the core complex. The core complexes of PSI and PSII bind 98 and 35 Chls, respectively (3, 4) and are highly conserved in eukaryotic organisms (5). The outer antenna, by contrast, varies in the different organisms as it is optimized for the absorption in their light-growth conditions (2). In plants and green algae, it is composed of members of the light-harvesting complex (Lhc) multigenic family, each coordinating between 10 and 14 Chls (a and b) (6, 7).

Despite the high sequence similarity, the number and properties of the Lhcs vary in plants and algae. LHCII trimers are composed of three major Lhcbs in Arabidopsis thaliana (Lhcb1–3 (8)) and of nine major Lhcbs in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. (LhcbM1–9 (9)). Three monomeric antenna, CP29 (Lhcb4), CP26 (Lhcb5), and CP24 (Lhcb6), located between the core and the LHCII trimers, are present in A. thaliana PSII-LHCII (10), whereas CP24 is absent in C. reinhardtii, resulting in a different organization of the PSII-LHCII supercomplex in the two organisms (11, 12). Concerning PSI-LHCI, in A. thaliana, four Lhcas (Lhca1–4) are associated with the PSI core (13), forming a PSI-LHCI complex that contains 155 Chls (14, 15). In C. reinhardtii, nine Lhcas compose the antenna of PSI (16), which is far larger than that of plants (17, 18).

The amount of excitation energy delivered to the RCs by the Lhcs does not only depend on their number but also on their biochemical and spectroscopic properties (19). The different affinity for Chl a and b between Lhcas and Lhcbs and the presence of far-red absorbing forms in Lhcas (20, 21) results in differences in the wavelength-dependent light-harvesting capacities of the two photosystems. This creates an excitation imbalance that can affect electron transport and induce photo-damage (22). To avoid this and maintain a maximal photosynthetic efficiency, plants and algae regulate the association of Lhcbs with PSI and PSII in a process known as state transitions (23, 24), in which mobile LHCII is associated with PSII in state 1 and with PSI in state 2. In plants, the mobile LHCII represents ∼15% of the total LHCII population, and under sunlight, it is mainly associated with PSI i.e. plants in light are in state 2 (25).

The mechanisms of state transitions in the green alga C. reinhardtii seem to differ from what is observed in plants (2628). For a long time, this difference was believed to be the pool size of LHCII involved in the transitions (80% according to Ref. 29); however, recent results suggest that the mechanism and probably also the physiological role of this process are different from in plants. It was indeed observed that although a large part of LHCII functionally disconnects from PSII during the state 1 to state 2 transition, only part of it associates with PSI, whereas the rest gets quenched (27, 28, 30). However, due to the complexity of the cells and the presence of different LHCII pools, a conclusion about excitation energy transfer efficiency from Lhcbs to PSI could not be made.

PSI-LHCI-LHCII supercomplexes with different antenna size have been purified (3134). The antenna size depends on the method used to induce the state transition and/or on the isolation protocol. The largest PSI-LHCI-LHCII isolated so far contains seven Lhcbs (two LHCII trimers and one monomer located on the PsaH/L side of the core complex), in addition to the nine Lhcas located on the other side of the core complex (34). This PSI-LHCI-LHCII is clearly larger than the PSI-LHCI-LHCII from plants that contains only one LHCII trimer (35, 36), although recent results indicate that in the membrane of plants, more than one LHCII trimer can be associated with PSI-LHCI (37).

In this work, we have performed time-resolved fluorescence measurements on the PSI-LHCI-LHCII complex of C. reinhardtii with or without preferential excitation of Lhcbs. We have determined the energy transfer efficiency of these Lhcbs and their influence on the trapping yield of PSI. The data indicate a loose connection between the Lhcbs and the PSI core, which is responsible for a relatively slow energy transfer step. These results are interpreted on the bases of the new PSI-LHCI structures (14, 15), and the possible energy transfer pathways in PSI-LHCI-LHCII are discussed.

Experimental Procedures

Sample Preparation

PSI-LHCI-LHCII was prepared as in Ref. 34 from the PSII-lacking mutant Fl39 of C. reinhardtii (34, 38, 39). In short, cells were harvested in mid-logarithmic phase (growth at 25 °C, 20 microeinsteins × m−2 s−1) and state 2 was induced by incubating them in anaerobic conditions (i.e. shaken in the dark for 20 min in the presence of NaN3). Thylakoid membranes were solubilized to a final concentration of 0.5 mg of chlorophyll/ml, 0.5% Digitonin (Sigma), and 0.2% dodecyl-α-d-maltoside, and then loaded on a sucrose gradient. PSI-LHCI-LHCII was harvested with a syringe.

Light-harvesting complexes II (Lhcbs) were prepared as in Ref. 12. Band 2 from the sucrose gradient contained Lhcb monomers such as CP26, CP29 and LhcbMs, and Band 3 contained LHCII trimers.

Fraction of Excitation in Lhcbs

To selectively excite Lhcbs, we determined the fraction of excitation in Lhcbs and chose excitation wavelengths for the time-resolved measurements that showed the largest differences. Lhcbs were excited the least upon 400 nm with 27–29% of PSI-LHCI-LHCII excitation present in the Lhcbs, whereas Lhcbs were excited the most upon 475 nm excitation corresponding to 41–46% of the excitation. To determine the fraction, we used two different methods as described in Ref. 40. For details, see SI1.

Steady State and Time-resolved Measurements

The absorption spectra were measured at room temperature with a Varian Cary 4000 UV-visible spectrophotometer. CD spectra were measured at 10 °C on a Chirascan-Plus CD spectrometer (Applied Photophysics, Surrey, UK). The 10 °C steady state fluorescence spectra were measured with a spectrofluorometer (FluoroLog, Horiba Scientific) upon 500 nm excitation. To avoid self-absorption, the sample was diluted to optical density 0.07 at the Qy maximum (1-cm path length) in a buffer containing 20 mm Hepes (pH 7.5) and 0.02% digitonin (Sigma).

Time-resolved fluorescence measurements were performed with a streak camera setup as described in Ref. 40. In short, fs pulses were generated with a repetition rate of 250 kHz using a laser system (Coherent Vitesse Duo and Coherent RegA 9000) and were used to feed the OPA (Coherent OPA 9400) to generate excitation light at 475 and 400 nm. The pulse energy was reduced to 0.3 nJ to avoid singlet-singlet annihilation. The exciting light focused on the sample was 0.151 mol of photons/m2/s at 475 nm and 0.127 mol of photons/m2/s at 400 nm. Fluorescence was detected at the magic angle with respect to the excitation polarization, in the 590–860 nm range from 0 to 400 ps. The sample was measured at 15 °C in its purification buffer (20 mm Hepes, pH 7.8, 0.02% digitonin, 0.7 m sucrose) in a 10 × 10-mm quartz cuvette at optical density 0.35 cm−1 at the Qy maximum. To avoid self-absorption, the laser beam was focused in the sample close to the cuvette wall, and emission was collected at a right angle close to the entry point of the laser beam into the cuvette. The sample was stirred with a magnet bar to avoid singlet-triplet annihilation. A power study confirmed the absence of annihilation (data not shown).

The fluorescence decays measured upon 400 and 475 nm excitation were analyzed with a sequential model (see SI1). The average decay time τav (Equation SI1-1) characterizes the time for the excitation energy to be used for charge separation and is calculated by considering only the components attributed to the PSI-LHCI-LHCII kinetics (excluding ns components attributed to disconnected species). For more details on the acquisition and data analysis, see SI1.

Target Analysis

We used the previous kinetic model describing C. reinhardtii PSI-LHCI (see Fig. 3a) (40) and extended it with a new compartment representing the seven Lhcbs (called “Lhcb”) in equilibrium with “Bulk” (see Fig. 3b). The natural decay rate constant of Lhcb was fixed to k0′ (3.3 ns)−1 as found for isolated LHCII trimers of C. reinhardtii (41).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Kinetic models for target analysis of PSI-LHCI (a) and of PSI-LHCI-LHCII (b), with the rate constants (in ns−1). Rate constants are either fitted (indicated in red) or fixed (indicated in black). Both supercomplexes have similar relative initial population in Red, Bulk and Lhca2/a9 compartments. In b, there is additional initial population on Lhcb. See SI1 for details.

The complete kinetic scheme (Scheme SI2-1) also contains precursors populating the other compartments on the ps time scale, with relative amounts varying depending on excitation wavelength (Table SI1-2), and a disconnected compartment corresponding to species with ns lifetimes. A detailed description of the procedure for the target analysis is given in SI1.

Simulated Kinetic Models

Population dynamics were simulated (MathWorks R2014b 64-bit, MATLAB) for hypothetical particles of: 1) different size (number of Chls a); 2) different connectivity; and 3) different composition (energy of Chls) (Scheme SI3-1). This enabled us to independently study the effects of these three factors on trapping time and efficiency. See SI3 for details.

Distance Measurements in the Reconstructed PSI-LHCI-LHCII

PSI-LHCI-LHCII EM of higher plants (36) and C. reinhardtii (34) were used to position the apoproteins of PSI and Lhcbs. The positions were set as close as possible to the EM, but uncertainties remain concerning the exact distance that separates the apoproteins and their relative orientation. The reconstruction was made with the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (Version 1.3) to have a three-dimensional perspective and a first estimation of distances between the Chls of interest.

Results

Steady State Characterization

Absorption and fluorescence emission spectra of PSI-LHCI-LHCII are shown in Fig. 1, a and b, together with the spectra of PSI-LHCI. The maximum Qy absorption of PSI-LHCI-LHCII (at 678 nm) as well as its maximum emission (at 683 nm) are blue-shifted as compared with the PSI-LHCI maxima (at 679.5 and 687.5 nm, respectively). The absorption difference spectrum between PSI-LHCI-LHCII and PSI-LHCI (Fig. 1a, green) overlaps well with the Lhcbs absorption spectrum (Fig. 1a, magenta) in agreement with previous results (34).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Absorption and emission and CD spectra. a, absorption at room temperature of PSI-LHCI (black) and PSI-LHCI-LHCII (blue) (scaled to their Chl content, see SI1) and their difference spectrum (green). The difference spectrum overlaps well with the absorption spectrum of Lhcbs from C. reinhardtii (magenta) (scaled LHCII trimer absorption) × 2 + (scaled Lhcb monomer) × 1). b, fluorescence emission spectra at 10 °C of PSI-LHCI and PSI-LHCI-LHCII, both upon 500 nm excitation, and of Lhcbs (isolated monomers) upon 475 nm excitation. The spectra are normalized to their maximum. c, CD spectra at 10 °C of PSI-LHCI and PSI-LHCI-LHCII (normalized to the absorption scaled to the Chl content). d, the difference spectrum between the CD spectra of PSI-LHCI and PSI-LHCI-LHCII is compared with the CD spectrum of LHCII trimers from plants (measured after solubilization of thylakoid membranes in dodecyl-α-d-maltoside (42)). a.u., arbitrary units.

CD spectra of PSI-LHCI-LHCII and PSI-LHCI are compared in Fig. 1c. They show similar features in the Qy absorption region (negative peaks at 648 and 680 nm and a positive peak at 664 nm), as well as in the Soret region (similar shape below 423 nm). Major differences are visible between 423 and 532 nm, as shown in the PSI-LHCI-LHCII minus PSI-LHCI difference spectrum (Fig. 1d, green). This spectrum strongly resembles the spectrum of LHCII trimers in detergent micelles (42) but also has some feature of aggregated LHCII trimers (distinct negative peak at 438 nm and positive peak at 483 nm (43)). This suggests that the Lhcbs are involved in additional (or modified) excitonic interactions and/or that as compared with the detergent, LHCII trimers associated with PSI-LHCI are present in a slightly different conformation similar to LHCII trimers in aggregates.

Excitation Energy Transfer and Trapping Kinetics

In this preparation, Lhcbs have been shown to be functionally associated to PSI-LHCI-LHCII (34). To characterize the excitation energy transfer and trapping kinetics of PSI-LHCI-LHCII and estimate the energy transfer rate between Lhcbs and PSI-LHCI, time-resolved fluorescence of PSI-LHCI-LHCII was measured with a streak camera set-up. In C. reinhardtii, as in higher plants, the PS core antenna contains only Chls a, whereas the peripheral antenna also contains Chls b. Excitation in the Chl a and in the Chl b region can then be used to disentangle the contributions of the core and peripheral antennas (44). More specifically, upon 475 nm excitation, 41–46% of the energy was in Lhcbs, whereas this value dropped to 27–29% upon 400 nm excitation. These two excitation wavelengths were chosen for the time-resolved measurements.

Global Sequential Analysis

The fluorescence decays measured upon 400 and 475 nm excitation were analyzed with a sequential model. The data can be well described by a minimum of four components (no structure in the residuals, Fig. 2). A clear difference between both excitation wavelengths is observed in the decay of PSI-LHCI-LHCII at an early time where fast Chl b decay is clearly visible after their preferential excitation at 475 nm (see in particular 656 nm in Fig. 2a). The decay-associated spectra (DAS) for both excitation wavelengths are shown in Fig. 2b. The first component is a pure energy transfer component (conservative positive-negative shape of the DAS) from blue Chls (a and b) to red Chls a for both excitation wavelengths. This transfer is faster at 400 nm than at 475 nm (1.8 ps as compared with 3.5 ps, respectively), possibly because of an additional transfer step occurring from Chls b to blue Chls a upon 475 nm where Chls b are preferentially excited. Indeed, the Chls b emission at ∼650 nm appears in the DAS of this fast component upon 475 nm excitation. The next two components are mainly decay components for both excitation wavelengths, with faster lifetimes upon 400 nm excitation as compared with 475 nm (∼20/∼90 ps as compared with ∼30/100 ps, respectively). The fourth component has very small amplitude (∼3–4%) and represents disconnected Lhcas/Lhcbs/Chls with ns lifetime (41, 45). Fit parameters are summarized in Fig. 2b.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Sequential analysis of PSI-LHCI-LHCII fluorescence decays upon 400 nm or 475 nm excitation at 15 °C. a, selected fluorescence decay traces after excitation at 400 nm (gray) and 475 nm (orange). Black and red lines indicate the fit curves. b, DAS of each decay component. The two different experiments were fitted simultaneously to link (l) the fourth lifetime associated to the disconnected species. The amplitude of each decay component (i.e. relative area = An/∑nAn) is shown in parentheses next to the corresponding lifetime, in %. The DAS are normalized to the initial populations of excited states (i.e. the total area of PSI-LHCI-LHCII-related DAS, ∑nAn). See SI1 for details. a.u., arbitrary units.

The average decay time τav of PSI-LHCI-LHCII is ∼65 ps upon 400 nm and ∼78 ps upon 475 nm. The association of Lhcbs increases the average decay time by ∼15 ps at 400 nm and by ∼27 ps at 475 nm as compared with the average decay times of PSI-LHCI (49.7 and 51.4 ps, respectively (40)).

Target Analysis

To estimate the energy transfer rate between PSI-LHCI and LHCII within PSI-LHCI-LHCII, a target analysis was performed on the two datasets (400 and 475 nm excitation) simultaneously. The previous kinetic scheme reported in Ref. 40 (Fig. 3a) was used to model PSI-LHCI-related kinetics, and the Lhcbs were modeled by an extra compartment (called “Lhcb”) transferring energy to the “Bulk” compartment (Fig. 3b). Several constraints were imposed on the fit parameters (rate constants, species-associated spectra (SAS), and initial populations) as described in SI1-iii. An additional compartment (Scheme SI2-1) accounts for a small population of disconnected species (∼3%) whose lifetime (3.2 ns) is very close to that of the Lhcbs in C. reinhardtii (41).

The kinetic model (Fig. 3b) fits the data well (Fig. SI2-1). Rate constants fitted from the target are given in Fig. 3b (in red), and the SAS are given in Fig. 4. The Lhcb SAS has a significantly lower red emission and a narrower bandwidth as compared with Bulk as expected (Fig. 4 and Fig. SI2-2b). The red shift visible in the Lhcb SAS as compared with the isolated Lhcb steady state emission spectrum (Fig. 4) suggests that Lhcbs associated with PSI are in a different conformation than when isolated in detergent, in agreement with the CD spectra. The free energy difference ΔG between Bulk and Lhcb is estimated, according to Equation 1, at −48 meV.

graphic file with name zbc05115-3310-m01.jpg

It corresponds to an enthalpy difference ΔH of −21 meV (ΔH = ΔG + TΔS = HBulkHLhcb = −kBT × ln(NLhcb/NBulk × k5/k6)) with 147 Chls a estimated in Bulk, see SI2-iv, and 55 Chls a in Lhcb, Table SI1-1). This enthalpy difference corresponds to an ∼9-nm blue shift of Lhcb as compared with Bulk.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Estimated SAS of each compartment and comparison with the steady state emission spectrum of Lhcbs (isolated monomers, dashed magenta normalized to Lhcb SAS maximum). The SAS are constrained to an equal area. Precursors and disconnected compartment SAS are presented in Fig. SI2-2. a. u., arbitrary units.

The amplitude matrices (Table 1 upon 475 nm and Table SI2-1 upon 400 nm excitation) detail the extent of (de)population of each compartment for each lifetime and give the time scale at which Lhcbs transfer energy to the rest of the supercomplex. The three shorter lifetimes do not have large amplitudes in the trapping (overall amplitude ∼0) and correspond to times where precursors transfer energy to the other four compartments. The ∼23-, ∼64-, and ∼97-ps lifetimes represent trapping components with most of the trapping occurring with the longest lifetime. With an ∼64-ps lifetime, Lhcb equilibrates (large positive amplitude) with all the other compartments. Similar observations can be made when exciting PSI-LHCI-LHCII at 400 nm (Table SI2-1) except that the ∼23-ps lifetime contributes more to the trapping than upon 475 nm. The average decay times obtained by target analysis of PSI-LHCI-LHCII are 70 ps upon 400 nm and 80 ps upon 475 nm excitation (see SI1-iii), consistent with the average decay times calculated from the sequential analysis (see above).

TABLE 1.

Amplitude matrices of PSI-LHCI-LHCII upon 475 nm excitation and the overall amplitude of the trapping at each lifetime

PSI-LHCI-LHCII (475 nm excitation)
Overall amplitude of the trapping
Lifetimes Red Bulk Lhca2/a9 Lhcb
ps
1.0 0.000 0.008 0.000 −0.447 0.000
1.1 −0.054 −0.491 0.016 0.001 −0.023
1.4 0.000 0.011 −0.065 0.000 0.001
6.5 −0.007 0.106 −0.067 −0.002 0.029
22.9 −0.047 0.152 0.059 −0.013 0.151
63.8 −0.308 0.064 0.018 0.397 0.171
97.3 0.416 0.151 0.040 0.063 0.670
Contributions of Antenna Size, Connectivity, and Composition to the Average Decay Time of PSI-LHCI and PSI-LHCI-LHCII

The equilibration time between two compartments is influenced by their size (number of Chls in each compartment), by their composition (energy of the Chls), and by the connectivity between them. To disentangle these different contributions, the kinetics of hypothetical PSI-LHCI and PSI-LHCI-LHCII complexes with different compartment size, composition, and/or connectivity were simulated (Scheme SI3-1), and their average decay time was compared (Table SI3-1). In the simulation, we have compared the effect of the presence of Lhca2 and Lhca9, the most loosely bound antenna complexes of PSI (18), with that of the seven Lhcbs. The simulations show that: 1) The addition of 16 Chls a (as many as initially contained in Lhca2 and Lhca9, see Table SI1-1 and SI2-iv) when isoenergetic with the bulk slows down the average decay time by ∼2.5 ps, while the addition of 55 Chls a (as many as initially contained in the seven Lhcbs, see Table SI1-1) slows it down by 4–6 ps. 2) The connectivity of PSI with Lhca2 and Lhca9 is very good and does not influence the average decay time of PSI-LHCI, whereas the connectivity between PSI-LHCI and Lhcbs is not optimal and is responsible for an increase of the decay time of 16–25 ps as compared with the best possible case. 3) The red forms contained in Lhca2 and Lhca9 (46) slow down the kinetics of PSI-LHCI by ∼5 ps, whereas the bluer Chls in Lhcbs (as compared with bulk Chls of PSI-LHCI) speed up the kinetics by 2–3 ps. A detailed description of the simulations is presented in SI3.

Discussion

Time-resolved measurements of the PSI-LHCI-LHCII complex of C. reinhardtii, the largest PSI supercomplex isolated so far (34), show that the trapping time of this supercomplex is ∼65 ps upon 400 nm excitation and ∼78 ps upon 475 nm excitation (Table 2). This large difference between the two excitation wavelengths is attributed to the differential excitation of Lhcbs (more Lhcb excitation at 475 nm, see Table SI1-2). This implies that the transfer from Lhcbs to PSI-LHCI is slow relative to the trapping within PSI-LHCI. The presence of seven Lhcbs slows down the overall trapping by 15 ps at 400 nm and by 27 ps at 475 nm excitation (Table 2). This result helps in interpreting the time-resolved data on C. reinhardtii in vivo (27). If a large population of PSI-LHCI-LHCII particles should be expected in the cells in state 2 as compared with state 1, not only a large difference in the amplitude of the PSI component should be observed but also a significant difference in its lifetime. The fact that none of these effects were observed in the time-resolved measurements in the cells indicates that the difference in the amount of LHCII associated with PSI in state 1 and 2 is relatively small as concluded by Ünlü et al. (27).

TABLE 2.

Average decay times and trapping efficiencies of PSI-LHCI-LHCII compared to PSI-LHCI

τno CS is the average decay time in the (hypothetical) case that charge separation (CS) cannot occur. τno CS is approximated as the average decay time of plant Lhca monomer (∼2 ns), the closest system of PSI-LHCI where charge separation does not occur.

PSI-LHCI (40) PSI-LHCI-LHCII
Excitation wavelength (in nm) 400 475 400 475
Average decay time τav (in ps) 49.7 51.4 64.8 78.4
Trapping efficiency (52) (ΦCS = 1 − τavno CS) 97.5% 97.4% 96.7% 96.0%

The detailed modeling of the measurements (Fig. 3b) shows that the excitation energy transfer between Lhcbs and the rest of the supercomplex occurs in ∼60 ps (Table 1). Several factors can influence the transfer rates: the antenna size, the energy of the pigments associated with the complexes, and the connectivity between Lhcbs and PSI-LHCI. To discriminate between the contributions of these factors to the trapping time of PSI-LHCI and PSI-LHCI-LHCII, we have simulated excited state population dynamics of hypothetical particles where each factor was controlled. The connectivity of the Lhcbs was compared with that of the most loosely bound Lhcas (Lhca2 and Lhca9) (18), which also show a relatively slow equilibration (∼7 ps) with the rest of the complex (40). The results indicate that the functional connectivity between Lhca2/a9 and the PSI complex is very high and that the observed relatively slow migration is due to the presence of low energy forms (46) in these Lhcas. This conclusion is in agreement with the observation that the presence of red forms slows down the trapping kinetics in different organisms (40, 4749). On the contrary, the results show that in PSI-LHCI-LHCII the favorable downhill energy transfer profile of Lhcbs cannot compensate their low connectivity with PSI core. This low connectivity largely explains the slow transfer from Lhcbs to the PSI core and can be due to a low number of transfer pathways.

To determine the possible transfer pathways in the PSI-LHCI-LHCII, we reconstructed its three-dimensional structure by mapping the structures of LHCII trimer (20), CP29 (6), and PSI-LHCI (14, 15) of higher plant onto the EM projection map of PSI-LHCI-LHCII of C. reinhardtii (34). The structure of all subunits of C. reinhardtii is expected to be similar to that of higher plants given the sequence similarity (50, 51). Different views of the structural model are presented in Fig. 5.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

a, EM images of PSI-LHCI-LHCII from C. reinhardtii (34) viewed from the stromal side superimposed with apoproteins of PSI-LHCI of higher plants in cyan (Protein Data Bank (PDB) 4XK8 (14)) and LHCII trimer in brown (PDB 1RWT (20)) assembled as PSI-LHCI-LHCII of higher plants (black outline of EM of A. thaliana (36)) (left); or superimposed with LHCII assembled as PSI-LHCI-LHCII of C. reinhardtii by slightly rotating the LHCII trimer in brown into the LHCII trimer in blue and by adding a new LHCII trimer in green, CP29 in yellow (PDB 3PL9 (6)), and the five additional Lhcas present in C. reinhardtii in magenta (duplicates of Lhca1 from Ref. 14) (right). The scale bar is 10 nm. The reconstruction was made with PyMOL. b, three-dimensional views of porphyrin rings from Chls bound to the apoproteins presented in a (right) with the same color: view from the stromal side (left) rotated 45° (upper right) or 90° (lower right) along the black axis. c, selection of the Chls present at the interface of Lhcbs and PSI core (1.8× magnification of the red frame in b). The shortest distances between the closest atoms of the porphyrin rings of PSI Chls and Lhcbs Chls are indicated in Å for the different sides of PSI core. d, Chls a trimer (red) binding PsaA (apoprotein in gray) and Chl a1401 (pink) newly found in Ref. 14, viewed from the side indicated with a red arrow in a (right). These Chls could be involved in energy transfer pathways with LHCII (apoprotein in light blue).

Using the reconstructed model of the supercomplex, we looked for the shortest distances between the Chls of Lhcbs and those of the PSI core (Fig. 5, b and c), which should represent possible energy transfer pathways. We could not identify pairs of Chls that are separated by less than 18 Å (nearest edge-to-edge distance), in line with the slow energy transfer between Lhcbs and PSI core observed in the measurements. The shortest distances are observed between Chl a612 of one LHCII trimer (which is in a similar position as in PSI-LHCI-LHCII of higher plant, and is depicted in blue in Fig. 5, nomenclature for LHCII Chls from (20)) and two PSI core Chls: Chl a1501 (nomenclature for the core Chls from Ref. 14, distance ∼21 Å) bound to PsaL and the additional Chl (distance ∼18 Å) associated with PsaH, which is only present in the structure of Mazor et al. (15) (PDB 4Y28, Chl designated as H1 in this structure). The next shortest distance is ∼25 Å and involves Chl a611 of the same LHCII trimer and Chl a1801, belonging to a PsaA Chl trimer that was proposed to connect PSI and LHCII trimer in plants in Ref. 15. Other pathways suggested in Refs. 14 and 15 involve Chl a1401 (coordinated to PsaA on the luminal side, Fig. 5, c and d) and Chl a1403 (coordinated to PsaK, Fig. 5, c and d) but are not expected to play a major role given the large distances that separate them from the Chls of LHCII (>30 Å). Similarly, PSI Chls are very far from the second LHCII trimer (depicted in green in Fig. 5, with Chl a612 at a distance of ∼45 Å from Chl a1501 in Ref. 14 or ∼37 Å from H1 in Ref. 15) as well as from the Lhcb monomer (Fig. 5c).

The three-dimensional reconstruction should be considered with some caution as the distances between the Chls can only be approximately estimated due to the low resolution of the EM maps, and the presence of one or two additional Chls in between the complexes cannot be completely excluded. However, it is clear that the gap between LHCII and the PSI core is rather large, and only a few energy transfer pathways seem to be available in agreement with the experimental results. The large distance between the Chls of PSI and LHCII also indicates that the observed differences in the CD signal between the sum of PSI-LHCI and LHCII spectra and the spectrum of the PSI-LHCI-LHCII complex are likely due to a different conformation assumed by LHCII when associated with PSI and not to the presence of new excitonic interactions between Chls of LHCII and PSI core.

It should be noticed that the observed loose connectivity between LHCII and PSI core has a small influence on the trapping efficiency of PSI-LHCI-LHCII. Indeed, even with a 43% increase in the number of Chls (Table SI1-1), the trapping yield of PSI-LHCI-LHCII is as high as 96% (Table 2) (52), only 1.4% lower than in the absence of Lhcbs. The 43% increase in Chls corresponds to an increase of the absorption cross section by 47% (averaged over the spectral range), which can make a significant difference in terms of light-harvesting capacities, especially under low light conditions. In this respect, it is interesting to notice the very large difference in efficiency and flexibility between PSI and PSII. We have previously estimated that 240 Chls a per RC represent a maximal antenna size for PSII because above this value the increase in light harvesting would be compensated by the slow migration toward the RC, resulting in an effective loss of efficiency (53). This is clearly not the case for PSI, which is able to accommodate a very large antenna, maintaining a high efficiency even in the presence of slow transfer. Indeed, the results presented here show that in PSI-LHCI-LHCII of C. reinhardtii, which contains 240 Chls a per RC, 96 out of 100 photons absorbed lead to charge separation in the RC. The design of PSI seems then to represent the way to go for efficient light harvesting.

Author Contributions

R. C. conceived the research; C. L. Q., B. v. O., and R. C. designed the research, B. D. prepared the samples; C. L. Q. performed all the spectroscopic experiments, the global analysis, and the modelling; and C. L. Q. and I. H. M. v. S. performed the target analysis. B. v. O. and R. C. supervised the research, and C. L. Q. and R. C. wrote the paper with contributions from all the authors. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Acknowledgment

We thank Yuval Mazor for providing the PDB file of his crystal structure of higher plant PSI-LHCI.

*

This work was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) Consolidator Grant 281341 (ASAP) (to R. C.) and by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) through a Vici grant (to R. C.) and a Veni grant (to B. v. O.). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

2
The abbreviations used are:
PS
Photosystem
LHC
light-harvesting complex
RC
reaction center
Chl
chlorophyll
DAS
decay-associated spectra
SAS
species-associated spectra.

References

  • 1.Blankenship R. E. (2014) Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 2nd Ed., Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Croce R., and van Amerongen H. (2014) Natural strategies for photosynthetic light harvesting. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 492–501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jordan P., Fromme P., Witt H. T., Klukas O., Saenger W., and Krauss N. (2001) Three-dimensional structure of cyanobacterial photosystem I at 2.5 Å resolution. Nature 411, 909–917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Umena Y., Kawakami K., Shen J.-R., and Kamiya N. (2011) Crystal structure of oxygen-evolving photosystem II at a resolution of 1.9 Å. Nature 473, 55–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hohmann-Marriott M. F., and Blankenship R. E. (2011) Evolution of photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 62, 515–548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pan X., Liu Z., Li M., and Chang W. (2013) Architecture and function of plant light-harvesting complexes II. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23, 515–525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ballottari M., Girardon J., Dall'osto L., and Bassi R. (2012) Evolution and functional properties of Photosystem II light harvesting complexes in eukaryotes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1817, 143–157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jansson S. (1999) A guide to the Lhc genes and their relatives in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Science 4, 236–240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Minagawa J., and Takahashi Y. (2004) Structure, function and assembly of Photosystem II and its light-harvesting proteins. Photosynthesis Research 82, 241–263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dekker J. P., and Boekema E. J. (2005) Supramolecular organization of thylakoid membrane proteins in green plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1706, 12–39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tokutsu R., Kato N., Bui K. H., Ishikawa T., and Minagawa J. (2012) Revisiting the supramolecular organization of photosystem II in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 31574–31581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Drop B., Webber-Birungi M., Yadav S. K. N., Filipowicz-Szymanska A., Fusetti F., Boekema E. J., and Croce R. (2014) Light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) and its supramolecular organization in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1837, 63–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ben-Shem A., Frolow F., and Nelson N. (2003) Crystal structure of plant photosystem I. Nature 426, 630–635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Qin X., Suga M., Kuang T., and Shen J.-R. (2015) Structural basis for energy transfer pathways in the plant PSI-LHCI supercomplex. Science 348, 989–995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mazor Y., Borovikova A., and Nelson N. (2015) The structure of plant photosystem I super-complex at 2.8 Å resolution. Elife 4, e07433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Takahashi Y., Yasui T. A., Stauber E. J., and Hippler M. (2004) Comparison of the subunit compositions of the PSI-LHCI supercomplex and the LHCI in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biochemistry 43, 7816–7823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stauber E. J., Busch A., Naumann B., Svatoš A., and Hippler M. (2009) Proteotypic profiling of LHCI from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii provides new insights into structure and function of the complex. Proteomics 9, 398–408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Drop B., Webber-Birungi M., Fusetti F., Kouı̌l R., Redding K. E., Boekema E. J., and Croce R. (2011) Photosystem I of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii contains nine light-harvesting complexes (Lhca) located on one side of the core. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 44878–44887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Croce R., and van Amerongen H. (2013) Light-harvesting in photosystem I. Photosynth. Res. 116, 153–166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu Z., Yan H., Wang K., Kuang T., Zhang J., Gui L., An X., and Chang W. (2004) Crystal structure of spinach major light-harvesting complex at 2.72 Å resolution. Nature 428, 287–292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wientjes E., and Croce R. (2011) The light-harvesting complexes of higher-plant Photosystem I: Lhca1/4 and Lhca2/3 form two red-emitting heterodimers. Biochem. J. 433, 477–485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rochaix J.-D. (2014) Regulation and dynamics of the light-harvesting system. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 65, 287–309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Allen J. F. (2003) State transitions: a question of balance. Science 299, 1530–1532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Minagawa J. (2011) State transitions: the molecular remodeling of photosynthetic supercomplexes that controls energy flow in the chloroplast. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1807, 897–905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wientjes E., van Amerongen H., and Croce R. (2013) LHCII is an antenna of both photosystems after long-term acclimation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1827, 420–426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Allorent G., Tokutsu R., Roach T., Peers G., Cardol P., Girard-Bascou J., Seigneurin-Berny D., Petroutsos D., Kuntz M., Breyton C., Franck F., Wollman F. A., Niyogi K. K., Krieger-Liszkay A., Minagawa J., and Finazzi G. (2013) A dual strategy to cope with high light in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell 25, 545–557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ünlü C., Drop B., Croce R., and van Amerongen H. (2014) State transitions in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strongly modulate the functional size of photosystem II but not of photosystem I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 3460–3465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nagy G., Ünnep R., Zsiros O., Tokutsu R., Takizawa K., Porcar L., Moyet L., Petroutsos D., Garab G., Finazzi G., and Minagawa J. (2014) Chloroplast remodeling during state transitions in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as revealed by noninvasive techniques in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 5042–5047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Delosme R., Olive J., and Wollman F.-A. (1996) Changes in light energy distribution upon state transitions: an in vivo photoacoustic study of the wild type and photosynthesis mutants from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1273, 150–158 [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wlodarczyk L. M., Snellenburg J. J., Ihalainen J. A., van Grondelle R., van Stokkum I. H. M., and Dekker J. P. (2015) Functional rearrangement of the light-harvesting antenna upon state transitions in a green alga. Biophys. J. 108, 261–271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kargul J., Turkina M. V., Nield J., Benson S., Vener A. V., and Barber J. (2005) Light-harvesting complex II protein CP29 binds to photosystem I of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under State 2 conditions. The FEBS Journal 272, 4797–4806 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Takahashi H., Iwai M., Takahashi Y., and Minagawa J. (2006) Identification of the mobile light-harvesting complex II polypeptides for state transitions in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 477–482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Takahashi H., Okamuro A., Minagawa J., and Takahashi Y. (2014) Biochemical characterization of photosystem I-associated light-harvesting complexes I and II isolated from state 2 cells of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell Physiol. 55, 1437–1449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Drop B., Yadav K. N., S., Boekema E. J., and Croce R. (2014) Consequences of state transitions on the structural and functional organization of Photosystem I in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant J. 78, 181–191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kouřil R., Zygadlo A., Arteni A. A., de Wit C. D., Dekker J. P., Jensen P. E., Scheller H. V., and Boekema E. J. (2005) Structural characterization of a complex of photosystem I and light-harvesting complex II of Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochemistry 44, 10935–10940 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Galka P., Santabarbara S., Khuong T. T., Degand H., Morsomme P., Jennings R. C., Boekema E. J., and Caffarri S. (2012) Functional analyses of the plant photosystem I-light-harvesting complex II supercomplex reveal that light-harvesting complex II loosely bound to photosystem II is a very efficient antenna for photosystem I in state II. Plant Cell 24, 2963–2978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bell A. J., Frankel L. K., and Bricker T. M. (2015) High yield non-detergent isolation of photosystem I-light-harvesting chlorophyll II membranes from spinach thylakoids: implications for the organization of PSI antennae in higher plants. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 18429–18437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Garnier J., Guyon D., and Picaud A. (1979) Characterization of new strains of nonphotosynthetic mutants of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. I. Fluorescence, photochemical activities, chlorophyll-protein complexes. Plant Cell Physiol. 20, 1013–1027 [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Maroc J., Garnier J., and Guyon D. (1989) Chlorophyll-protein complexes related to photosystem I in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 4, 97–109 [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Le Quiniou C., Tian L., Drop B., Wientjes E., van Stokkum I. H. M., van Oort B., and Croce R. (2015) PSI-LHCI of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: Increasing the absorption cross section without losing efficiency. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1847, 458–467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Natali A., and Croce R. (2015) Characterization of the major light-harvesting complexes (LHCBM) of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. PLoS ONE 10, e0119211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Georgakopoulou S., van der Zwan G., Bassi R., van Grondelle R., van Amerongen H., and Croce R. (2007) Understanding the changes in the circular dichroism of light harvesting complex II upon varying its pigment composition and organization. Biochemistry 46, 4745–4754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Akhtar P., Dorogi M., Pawlak K., Kovács L., Bóta A., Kiss T., Garab G., and Lambrev P. H. (2015) Pigment interactions in light-harvesting complex II in different molecular environments. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 4877–4886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.van Oort B., Amunts A., Borst J. W., van Hoek A., Nelson N., van Amerongen H., and Croce R. (2008) Picosecond fluorescence of intact and dissolved PSI-LHCI crystals. Biophys J 95, 5851–5861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Passarini F., Wientjes E., van Amerongen H., and Croce R. (2010) Photosystem I light-harvesting complex Lhca4 adopts multiple conformations: red forms and excited-state quenching are mutually exclusive. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1797, 501–508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mozzo M., Mantelli M., Passarini F., Caffarri S., Croce R., and Bassi R. (2010) Functional analysis of Photosystem I light-harvesting complexes (Lhca) gene products of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1797, 212–221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gobets B., van Stokkum I. H. M., Rögner M., Kruip J., Schlodder E., Karapetyan N. V., Dekker J. P., and van Grondelle R. (2001) Time-resolved fluorescence emission measurements of photosystem I particles of various cyanobacteria: a unified compartmental model. Biophys. J. 81, 407–424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jennings R. C., Zucchelli G., Croce R., and Garlaschi F. M. (2003) The photochemical trapping rate from red spectral states in PSI-LHCI is determined by thermal activation of energy transfer to bulk chlorophylls. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1557, 91–98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wientjes E., van Stokkum I. H. M., van Amerongen H., and Croce R. (2011) The role of the individual Lhcas in photosystem I excitation energy trapping. Biophys. J. 101, 745–754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hippler M., Rimbault B., and Takahashi Y. (2002) Photosynthetic complex assembly in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Protist 153, 197–220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Allen J. F., de Paula W. B., Puthiyaveetil S., and Nield J. (2011) A structural phylogenetic map for chloroplast photosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 645–655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.van Amerongen H., Valkunas L., and van Grondelle R. (2000) Photosynthetic Excitons, pp. 401–478, World Scientific, Singapore [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wientjes E., van Amerongen H., and Croce R. (2013) Quantum yield of charge separation in photosystem II: functional effect of changes in the antenna size upon light acclimation. J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 11200–11208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES