Skip to main content
Astrobiology logoLink to Astrobiology
. 2015 Dec 1;15(12):1076–1090. doi: 10.1089/ast.2014.1278

Isolation of Radiation-Resistant Bacteria from Mars Analog Antarctic Dry Valleys by Preselection, and the Correlation between Radiation and Desiccation Resistance

Michaela Musilova 1,,*,, Gary Wright 2, John M Ward 3, Lewis R Dartnell 4,,5,,
PMCID: PMC4683558  PMID: 26684506

Abstract

Extreme radiation–resistant microorganisms can survive doses of ionizing radiation far greater than are present in the natural environment. Radiation resistance is believed to be an incidental adaptation to desiccation resistance, as both hazards cause similar cellular damage. Desert soils are, therefore, promising targets to prospect for new radiation-resistant strains. This is the first study to isolate radiation-resistant microbes by using gamma-ray exposure preselection from the extreme cold desert of the Antarctic Dry Valleys (a martian surface analogue). Halomonads, identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, were the most numerous survivors of the highest irradiation exposures. They were studied here for the first time for both their desiccation and irradiation survival characteristics. In addition, the association between desiccation and radiation resistance has not been investigated quantitatively before for a broad diversity of microorganisms. Thus, a meta-analysis of scientific literature was conducted to gather a larger data set. A strong correlation was found between desiccation and radiation resistance, indicating that an increase in the desiccation resistance of 5 days corresponds to an increase in the room-temperature irradiation survival of 1 kGy. Irradiation at −79°C (representative of average martian surface temperatures) increases the microbial radiation resistance 9-fold. Consequently, the survival of the cold-, desiccation-, and radiation-resistant organisms isolated here has implications for the potential habitability of dormant or cryopreserved life on Mars. Key Words: Extremophiles—Halomonas sp.—Antarctica—Mars—Ionizing radiation—Cosmic rays. Astrobiology 15, 1076–1090.

1. Introduction

Extremophiles are organisms surviving in environments considered to be physically or chemically extreme (Rothschild and Mancinelli, 2001). Extremophiles exhibit extraordinary tolerance to extremes of, for example, temperature, pH, or salinity. The exceptional resistance to ionizing radiation exhibited by the bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans was initially something of a puzzle, as it could tolerate exposures far higher than that ever encountered in the natural world. One proposed resolution was that D. radiodurans did not adapt to be radiation-resistant per se but has responded to selection pressures to improve desiccation survival (Mattimore and Battista, 1996).

Desiccation tolerance is the ability of cells to survive nearly complete dehydration through air drying (Billi and Potts, 2002). Dehydration causes severe disruption of enzymes and electron transport chains, which results in the accumulation of free radicals (Billi and Potts, 2002) and subsequently DNA damage (Dose et al., 1992). Free-radical-mediated DNA damage also occurs under ionizing radiation exposure. Both desiccation and ionizing radiation cause a similar pattern of DNA damage and double-strand breaks. Therefore cellular mechanisms for recovery after desiccation are hypothesized to confer an incidental resistance to radiation (Mattimore and Battista, 1996; Billi et al., 2000). Previous studies have found other organisms that exhibit resistance to both desiccation and radiation (Dose et al., 1992; Billi et al., 2000; Rainey et al., 2005; La Duc et al., 2007). For instance, Billi et al. (2000) found that strains of the cyanobacterial genus Chroococcidiopsis from both desert and hypersaline environments were also ionizing radiation–resistant. Similarly, Kottemann et al. (2005) reported that an archaeon, Halobacterium sp. strain NRC1, isolated from a hypersaline environment, was highly resistant to both desiccation and gamma irradiation. Sanders and Maxcy (1979) were able to isolate radiation-resistant species by selecting for desiccation tolerance, without exposure to irradiation. However, the nature of any correlation between desiccation resistance and radiation resistance has not been quantitatively investigated across a variety of different microorganisms, and is addressed in this study. Desiccation- and radiation-resistant multicellular organisms (e.g., chironomids, tardigrades, rotifers, and nematodes) (Grewal et al., 2002; Watanabe et al., 2006; Jonsson, 2007; Gladyshev and Meselson, 2008) have different and more complicated cell repair systems, which is why they were not compared with microorganisms in this study.

Hypersaline or desiccating desert locations thus offer promising environments that favor the presence of incidentally radiation-resistant strains. The McMurdo Dry Valleys (MDV) in Antarctica are considered the coldest hyper-arid desert environment on Earth (Cowan et al., 2014) and represent a terrestrial analog site for the martian surface. MDV have a total ice-free area of 4500 km2, making them the largest (15%) ice-free land portion of the continent (Cary et al., 2010; Levy, 2013). This region has a mean annual surface temperature of near −20°C (Doran et al., 2002) with temperatures dropping down to −60°C in the winter (Horowitz et al., 1972; Cary et al., 2010). Frequent daily temperature fluctuations of >20°C often result in multiple freeze-thaw cycles (Aislabie et al., 2006; Barrett et al., 2008). Further environmental factors that pose extreme stresses on microbial life are the low bioavailability of water [<10 cm yr−1 water equivalent precipitation (Witherow et al., 2006)], high MDV soil salt concentrations (Vishniac, 1993; Bockheim, 1997; Treonis et al., 2000), steep geochemical gradients (Nkem et al., 2006; Poage et al., 2008), low levels of organic material in MDV soils (<1% by weight) (Vishniac, 1993; Burkins et al., 2000), and elevated levels of ultraviolet B radiation (Smith et al., 1992; Tosi et al., 2005) caused by the “Ozone Hole” depletion of stratospheric ozone (Farman et al., 1985; Jones and Shanklin, 1995).

The McMurdo Dry Valleys therefore offer a natural environment likely to contain desiccation-resistant and thus incidentally radiation-resistant microorganisms. In addition to simply culturing from soil samples, the successful isolation of radiation-resistant strains can be improved by high-dose radiation exposure before culturing, so as to preferentially select radiation-tolerant survivors. Such an approach has been previously attempted from different sampling locations. Ferreira et al. (1999) isolated novel thermophilic and radiation-resistant strains of Rubrobacter by gamma-irradiating samples from hot springs; Rainey et al. (2005) and Chanal et al. (2006) discovered new species of the Deinococcus genus by pre-irradiation of arid soil from the Sonoran and Tataouine deserts, respectively; Zhang et al. (2007) isolated a novel Hymenobacter species from irradiated Xinjiang desert sand; and Shukla et al. (2007) gamma-irradiated cell suspensions extracted from varied environments and isolated five ionizing radiation–resistant bacteria. This present study is the first to apply a preselection methodology to culturing from MDV soils.

A further motivation for studying MDV samples is in the interests of astrobiology. The habitability of the martian surface, with respect to terrestrial life, can be assessed by comparison to similar terrestrial environments and the extremophilic organisms found surviving in those conditions. Mars is believed to have had surface conditions in the past clement enough to allow for the development of life. The current environmental conditions on the surface would present a severe challenge to life, but the study of extremophilic microbes surviving in terrestrial habitats analogous to Mars suggests certain martian locales may remain habitable (Horneck, 2000). MDV soils are a meaningful analogue for the cold desert of the martian surface, in terms of very low temperatures, organic-poor soils, high levels of solar radiation, and desiccating conditions (Horowitz et al., 1972; McKay, 1993; Wynn-Williams and Edwards, 2000). They have even been used as an analogue for the Mars Phoenix landing site (Tamppari et al., 2012) and are considered to be a valuable research site for investigating microbial survival in the interests of astrobiology (Horowitz et al., 1972; McKay, 1993; Wynn-Williams and Edwards, 2000).

One environmental hazard on the martian surface that is not reproduced on Earth is the ionizing radiation from the unshielded flux of cosmic rays (Pavlov et al., 2002; Dartnell, 2011). Mars, today, lacks a substantial atmosphere or global dipolar magnetic field and so receives negligible protection from solar energetic protons accelerated by the sun or galactic cosmic rays originating from supernovae throughout the galaxy (Dartnell, 2011). The most energetic primary particles trigger extensive secondary cascades that penetrate through the top 2–3 m of the martian surface (Pavlov et al., 2002; Dartnell et al., 2007a, 2007b). Thus, ionizing radiation represents a hazard that penetrates much deeper than solar ultraviolet radiation and the oxidizing soil (Dartnell et al., 2007a, 2007b). The Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover has measured an annual radiation dose of 76 mGy yr−1 on the martian surface (Hassler et al., 2014). The low temperatures on Mars mean that any surviving microbial martian life, near the surface, is likely held dormant or cryopreserved. Periods of high obliquity on Mars are believed to produce high-enough temperatures and, thus, sufficient water activity in martian soils to permit episodic near-surface life reanimation and repair every tens of thousands to millions of years (Dartnell et al., 2007b; Tamppari et al., 2012). Consequently, the microorganisms would not be metabolically active and able to repair accumulating radiation doses for potentially thousands to millions of years. Resistance to ionizing radiation would, therefore, be another crucial cellular characteristic for the potential persistence of dormant martian microbial life accumulating radiation damage over time. In this way, the isolation of ionizing radiation–resistant bacteria from the cold, desiccated Mars analog MDV soils is also important for understanding the potential habitability of Mars.

Here, an irradiation preselection procedure was performed on soil samples from the cold desert environment of the Antarctic Dry Valleys. The aims of this study were twofold: to use irradiation preselection to attempt to isolate novel radiation-resistant bacteria from samples of MDV desiccated soils and to quantitatively investigate the nature of the correlation between desiccation and radiation resistance.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Antarctic Dry Valley sample collection

The environmental samples used in this study were collected from frozen MDV soils during the austral summer of February 2002 (Whiting, 2004). Sampling locations were selected along a Miers Valley Transect (MVT), up the valley side from the floor, and so represent a diversity of altitudes and soil conditions. Sample MVT1 was taken at GPS coordinates 78°05.679′S, 163°48.271′E, ∼169 m altitude, from wet ground in a floodplain. MVT4 was collected at 78°05.541′S, 163°48.310′E, ∼183 m altitude, from dry, fine gravels at the base of the northern slope of the MVT. MVT12 was gathered approximately 15 m below the saddle of the Miers and Marshall Valleys, at ∼820 m altitude, consisting of dry, fine gravels within a protected rock alcove. Samples were collected aseptically into sterile autoclaved polypropylene tubes (Nalgene), maintained at temperatures below 0°C throughout fieldwork and transit, before laboratory storage at −80°C (Whiting, 2004). Figure 1 displays the locations of these three sampling sites in the context of the MDV region.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Miers Valley Transect sampling locations indicated within the McMurdo Dry Valleys in Antarctica. The figure was prepared by the authors based on a NASA Landsat 7 photograph and ArcGIS using the GPS coordinates of the sampling locations from this study (Whiting, 2004). (Color graphics available at www.liebertonline.com/ast)

2.2. Preselection for radiation resistance and strain isolation

Subsamples (3 g) of each of the MDV soil samples were placed in sterile universal tubes under sterile conditions, then maintained in storage at −80°C before irradiation. Gamma-ray exposure for the purposes of preselection for radiation-resistant microbes was provided by the colbalt-60 gamma-ray source at Cranfield University, Shrivenham, UK. Sample tubes were packed into dry ice in thin-walled polystyrene boxes to maintain a temperature of −79°C throughout the exposure, so as to suspend metabolic activity and emulate martian surface temperatures. Distance from the cylindrical source determined the radiation dose received, so samples were arranged in carefully determined circular arcs around the central source for the appropriate total dose. Further details on the radiation exposure setup are provided in Dartnell et al. (2010b). The Cranfield gamma-ray source is regularly calibrated with dosimetry, and an error of ±5% is estimated for the total doses delivered, including error in both the timing of the exposure and positioning of the sample (Dartnell et al., 2010b). Triplicates of the samples were exposed to a total of 0, 1, 2, 4, or 6 kGy of gamma radiation, with the 0 kGy subsample from each dry valley site designated as the control. Control samples were exposed to no radiation from the source but were treated identically to the other samples in respect of the preparation, transport, and subsequent culturing procedure.

The aim of this study was to isolate novel radiation-resistant strains, so cells were cultured from the irradiated soils, starting with the samples exposed to the two highest doses of 4 and 6 kGy. Irradiated samples were thawed, 2 mL of sterile Dulbecco's phosphate buffer solution (PBS; Sigma) were added to each sample, and the sample tubes were vortexed for 1 min to dislodge cells into suspension in the fluid. Following a colony-forming unit (CFU) assay protocol, a 10-fold dilution series was performed on the suspensions over the range 10−1 to 10−5 cells g−1. It was expected that MDV soil samples of this kind would contain approximately 104 cells g−1 (Gilichinsky, 2002; Dartnell et al., 2010a, 2010b). From these dilutions, 50 μL were pipetted and spread on nutrient agar plates. Three formulations of nutrient agar were used for culturing: quarter-strength nutrient broth (¼ NB: Difco, 8.0 g per 1 L deionized water), quarter-strength R2A broth (¼ R2A: Difco, 18.2 g per 1 L of deionized water), and quarter-strength Czapek-Dox broth (¼ CZD: Difco, 35.0 g per 1 L of deionized water), each of which was solidified with 2% (w/v) agar (Difco). Quarter-strength concentrations of these standard microbiological culturing media have previously been found to be effective at culturing microorganisms from the MDV oligotrophic environment (Dartnell et al., 2010b). The un-irradiated control samples were also processed as above to determine the initial viable soil population. In addition, a sterile plate (not spread with any sample diluent) of each media type was prepared to allow monitoring of possible contamination during the culturing procedure. Plates were incubated for 14 days at both room temperature (RT; 25°C) and 4°C to test for psychrophiles. Twenty-six colonies were sequentially subcultured by picking and replating to obtain pure isolates for sequencing. They were selected on the basis of their color, size, and colony morphology to capture as broad a range of phylogenetic and morphological diversity as possible.

2.3. Identification by 16S rRNA gene sequencing

The chosen isolates, which had survived the irradiation preselection, were identified to genus level by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. A single colony of each isolate was picked with a sterile pipette tip, resuspended in 50 μL of molecular-biology-grade water (molH2O; Sigma), and vortexed. These suspensions were used as templates to amplify a 1.5 kb region of the 16S rRNA gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), using 27F (AGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG) (Weisburg et al., 1991) and un1492R (GGTACCTTGTTACGACTT) (DeLong, 1992) primers in a Techne TC-512 thermal cycler. PCR reactions were performed as described in Dartnell et al. (2010b). Following the manufacturer's instructions, the products were purified with a QIAQuick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN) then sequenced with the above primers. The returned forward and reverse sequences overlapped (600–800 bp of good gene sequence from each of the ends) and so allowed the reconstruction of the complete 16S rRNA gene (with sequences 1200–1400 bp long). These were used to identify the genus of each isolate through the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP; http://rdp.cme.msu.edu), and the closest relatives were found by using the BLASTn (NCBI) sequence search utility (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). RDP was also used to construct a phylogenetic tree of the sequenced strains, which was displayed using the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL; http://itol.embl.de), as shown in Fig. 3.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Phylogenetic tree of the 26 bacterial strains isolated from MDV soil samples that had been irradiated to select for resistant survivors and identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (blue). The nearest relatives of the novel isolates found by BLASTn searches are also included (black). Most of the isolates were Halomonas, a halophilic genus, with Staphylococcus and Rhodobacter genera represented by a single isolate each. (Color graphics available at www.liebertonline.com/ast)

2.4. Determination of the radiation survival response

Four strains were selected for further characterization of their resistance to both desiccation and ionizing radiation. These four isolates were chosen because they belong to the genus Halomonas, which has not been studied previously in terms of ionizing radiation resistance. They will be referred to as Miers Valley Transect (MVT) 161, 463, 464, and 468 strains. Although originally isolated on quarter-strength media, they were found to grow faster on full-strength NB. They also grew equally well at RT as at 4°C; therefore the subsequent culturing was conducted at 25°C. The liquid cultures of these four strains were grown from the starter culture in 100 mL NB in 1000 mL conical flasks, incubated at 25°C for 4 days with constant agitation at 140 rpm. These stationary-phase liquid cultures were then washed of growth medium by centrifugation and resuspension of the cell pellet in PBS. The same cell suspension in PBS was used for both the following radiation and desiccation survival studies. Irradiation targets consisted of 1 mL subsamples in triplicate pipetted into sterilized 2 mL borosilicate clear glass vials (2-CV, Chromacol), stoppered with UV-sterilized 11 mm polyethylene snap caps (11-PEC1, Chromacol) and frozen at −80°C.

Samples were irradiated, at the Cranfield University facility again, and packed in dry ice to maintain a temperature of −79°C (as before, to suspend metabolic activity and emulate martian surface temperatures). They were arranged in circular arcs around the cylindrical cobalt-60 source to expose samples to a dose range of 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, and 15 kGy. Dartnell et al. (2010b) confirmed that cellular survival of irradiation is independent of dose rate at −79°C. Unirradiated, but otherwise identically handled, samples were designated as controls.

After irradiation, samples were thawed to perform a serial dilution and CFU assay to determine the remaining number of viable cells. This CFU assay was performed in triplicate for each dose sample. The standard error of these independent cell counts was plotted as the data point error bar in population survival plots. Control (frozen but not exposed) samples gave the pre-irradiation population number. Therefore, the ratio of the irradiated sample viable cell count to that of the relevant control yielded the population survival fraction at each gamma-ray irradiation dose for each cell strain (Dartnell et al., 2010b).

2.5. Determination of the desiccation survival response

The same cell suspension in PBS, as above, was used for the desiccation survival response experiment. For each selected strain, 100 μL subsamples of the liquid cultures in triplicate were pipetted into sterile 10 × 35 mm tissue culture dishes (Falcon). In addition to the four strains isolated in this present study, two other strains previously isolated from the Miers Valley and assessed for radiation survival, Brevundimonas sp. MV7 and Rhodococcus sp. MV10 (Dartnell et al., 2010b), were also tested to characterize their desiccation survival. The tissue culture dishes were stacked in sterilized air-tight Nalgene tubs containing 100 g of granulated anhydrous calcium chloride as a desiccant (CaCl2). A control dish with 100 μL of sterile NB was added to the tubs as a check for contamination. After set intervals, of between 1 and 42 days, dishes for each strain were removed from the tubes. They were rehydrated with 1 mL PBS and agitated for 15 min on an oscillating table at 70 oscillations/min to recover the previously desiccated cells into suspension. Dilution series and CFU assays were then performed in triplicate on the recovered rehydrated samples to determine the remaining viable population (Dartnell et al., 2010a).

2.6. Meta-analysis of published literature data

To gather a greater data set, a meta-analysis of previously published data in the literature was conducted. The strategy employed to find relevant papers combined key-word searches of online publication databases and subsequently checking those papers referenced by appropriate reports. To be suitable for inclusion, studies must have reported both desiccation and ionizing radiation survival experiments on the same microorganism. Those found were Romanovskaya et al. (2002), Kottemann et al. (2005), Rainey et al. (2005), Shukla et al. (2007), Callegan et al. (2008), and Slade and Radman (2011). This meta-dataset contains a total of 25 organism survival responses, although Deinococcus radiodurans was studied by multiple authors.

3. Results

3.1. Preselection for radiation resistance

Sampling locations along the MVT, within the MDV, are shown in Fig. 1. The environmental samples MVT1, MVT4, and MVT12 yielded culturable cells after 4 and 6 kGy of gamma irradiation. Cell counts for these three samples were averaged across all three growth media and both temperatures, since there were no significant differences in cell numbers between the nutrient and temperature conditions (Fig. 2). Figure 2 represents an approximate evaluation of the radiation resistance of the microbial community as a whole within the three MVT soil samples. For all samples, the cell numbers were reduced by over an order of magnitude by irradiation at 4 kGy and continued to decrease with increasing irradiation. No significant differences can be seen between the different sample types.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Approximate MVT soil community radiation survival responses with cell counts averaged across all three nutrient media and both incubation temperatures. Error bars indicate the standard error of the population count replicates. Cell numbers were reduced by over an order of magnitude by irradiation at 4 kGy. No significant differences can be seen between the different sample types. Inset shows a rescaled view of the high-dose survival rates.

3.2. 16S rRNA gene sequence identification

Cells remaining viable from the soil microbial communities exposed to the two highest gamma-radiation doses, 4 and 6 kGy, were isolated in an effort to recover potentially radiation-resistant survivors. Each of the isolated radiation survivors was found to grow well at RT, rather than 4°C, thus expediting the subsequent desiccation and radiation resistance tests. All 26 strains were successfully sequenced. Figure 3 displays the phylogenetic tree calculated for the 26 sequenced isolates, as well as their closest relatives reported by BLASTn and related type strains. It was plotted using Desulfurococcaceae strain SRI-465 as the outgroup. The strains belong to three phyla: Firmicutes (Staphylococcus sp.), Proteobacteria (Rhodobacter sp., Herbaspirillum sp., and Halomonas sp.), and Bacteroidetes (Hymenobacter sp.).

The four isolates selected for further characterization of their radiation and desiccation survival response were strain 161 from MVT1 and strains 463, 464, and 468 (all three from MVT4). They were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing as species of the Halomonas genus (99% similarity based) (Fig. 3). They will be further referred to as Halomonas sp. MVT 161, Halomonas sp. MVT 463, Halomonas sp. MVT 464, and Halomonas sp. MVT 468. The reason these Halomonas strains were selected for further characterization of their radiation and desiccation survival responses was that they are halophilic extremophiles, which have not been studied previously for their radiation resistance. Strains Halomonas sp. MVT 161 and 468 had bright yellow colonies with well-defined boundaries, whereas the strains Halomonas sp. MVT 463 and 464 had the same colony morphology but were light pink in color.

3.3. Radiation resistance

Figure 4 plots the surviving viable cell count of the four isolates Halomonas sp. MVT 161, 463, 464, and 468 after increasing doses of gamma radiation, normalized to the initial population. For comparison, the radiation survival responses previously determined for two other Antarctic strains, Brevundimonas sp. MV7 and Rhodococcus sp. MV10, are plotted. They were also isolated from Miers Valley soils (Dartnell et al., 2010b) but without an ionizing radiation preselection procedure. The survival response of all strains can be seen to follow a simple exponential decline (a linear trend in log-space) with radiation exposure. Consequently, trend lines are fitted to each data set with the form y = e-a.x. All four Halomonas strains exhibit a radiation resistance significantly greater than the two strains previously isolated from Miers Valley soil without irradiation preselection (Brevundimonas sp. MV7 and Rhodococcus sp. MV10). Halomonas sp. MVT 161 exhibited the greatest radiation resistance of the strains tested here, although strain 468 was comparable. Despite being isolated from distinctly different micro-environments on the Miers Valley wall transect, these two strains also exhibit identical colony morphologies (bright yellow) and so could be representatives of the same species. Even though they show close 16S rRNA gene similarity with Halomonas sp. MVT 161 and 468, strains MVT 463 and 464 exhibit lower radiation resistance (though comparable to each other and with the same light pink colony appearance).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Ionizing radiation survival plot of the four new Halomonas isolates. Exponential trend lines are fitted, and error bars indicate the standard error of the population count replicates. The survival responses determined previously (Dartnell et al., 2010b) are shown for two Antarctic strains, Brevundimonas sp. MV7 and Rhodococcus sp. MV10. (Color graphics available at www.liebertonline.com/ast)

3.4. Desiccation resistance

The six strains tested for desiccation resistance were the four new Miers Valley isolates as well as the two previously isolated Miers Valley strains, Brevundimonas sp. MV7 and Rhodococcus sp. MV10 (Dartnell et al., 2010b). Figure 5 plots the remaining population of viable cells, normalized to the initial cell count, as a function of the number of days desiccated. A more complex desiccation survival response is exhibited by all six strains than the simple exponential decay found with radiation exposure (Fig. 4). All strains show a rapid decline in the viable population over the first 5 days of desiccation. The gradient flattened in the continuing survival response up to the maximum exposure duration tested (42 days). Attempts were made to fit double exponential functions, of the form y = e-a.x + b.e-c.x, to these data. Nonetheless, they could not provide a satisfactory fit to the data series, so no trend lines are plotted in Fig. 5.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Desiccation survival plots for the four new Halomonas isolates, along with those also determined here for the other MDV strains Brevundimonas sp. MV7 and Rhodococcus sp. MV10, isolated by Dartnell et al. (2010a). Error bars show the standard errors calculated for the population counts. (Color graphics available at www.liebertonline.com/ast)

Survival of all four Halomonas isolates was reduced to a comparable surviving population of less than 1% after 42 days of desiccation. However, as shown in Fig. 5, strains 161 and 468 exhibit a similar response to each other and decline most readily at first before reaching the plateau. Conversely, strains 463 and 464 display a more steady decrease after the initial 2 days of desiccation. This pairing of responses repeats that seen in the radiation survival experiment. All four isolated strains show significantly greater desiccation resistance after 42 days than Brevundimonas sp. MV7 and Rhodococcus sp. MV10. The halomonads had an order of magnitude greater survival than the two strains cultured from Miers Valley soil without an ionizing radiation preselection (Dartnell et al., 2010a).

The metric quantifying each organism's survival response to hazards such as desiccation and radiation is taken here as the D10 value. This is the level of exposure that results in 10% of the initial population remaining viable, which for desiccation survival is the number of days in the desiccator and for gamma-ray exposure is the total absorbed dose. D10 values were extracted from the ionizing radiation and desiccation survival responses (Table 1) for each of the four new Halomonas isolates, the other MDV strains Brevundimonas sp. MV7 and Rhodococcus sp. MV10 (tested here for desiccation resistance), and the radiation-resistant model organism Deinococcus radiodurans (Dartnell et al., 2010b). These metrics of organism resistance gathered here are plotted against each other in Fig. 8, compared to data collected through literature meta-analysis.

Table 1.

Desiccation and Radiation Survival Responses are Summarized with the D10 Metric

Organism Label Desiccation D10 (days) Radiation D10 (kGy)
Halomonas sp. MVT 161 a 1.53 2.66
Halomonas sp. MVT 463 b 1.70 1.80
Halomonas sp. MVT 464 c 1.85 1.90
Halomonas sp. MVT 468 d 1.57 2.50
Brevundimonas sp. MV7 e 0.99 1.26
Rhodococcus sp. MV10 f 1.9 0.55
Deinococcus radiodurans g 26 50

Data for the four Halomonas strains, Brevundimonas sp. MV7, and Rhodococcus sp. MV10 are extracted from Figs. 4 and 5. Desiccation data for Deinococcus radiodurans is taken from Dartnell et al. (2010a), using an identical methodology, and the radiation D10 value is extracted from Richmond et al. (1999), as this study extended to higher radiation doses at −79°C than Dartnell et al. (2010b). Letter labels correspond to those for data points in Fig. 8.

FIG. 8.

FIG. 8.

Ionizing radiation survival D10 values plotted against the corresponding desiccation resistance D10 metric for 16 microorganisms (from this study and from the literature analysis). Strains characterized in this present study are shown as black triangles and identified by a letter label as listed in Table 1. The D10 value for Deinococcus radiodurans irradiated at −79°C (g) lies beyond the plotted range at (26, 50), but it is included in the fitted trend line. Desiccation and radiation survival data extracted from the literature review appear as colored dots. The organisms are identified by a number label (indicated in Table 2, Figs. 6 and 7) and by the same color coding as in Figs. 6 and 7. Radiation experiments from the literature generally irradiated bacterial samples at RT or chilled. Thus, due to the temperature dependence of irradiation survival, they lie on a different trend line to the exposures here conducted at −79°C. The equation and Pearson correlation coefficient of each trend line are labeled. (Color graphics available at www.liebertonline.com/ast)

3.5. Literature meta-analysis

Figure 6 displays the radiation survival data extracted from the literature meta-analysis studies. Pattern and color coding indicates the publication source (see figure caption). D10 values were extracted from 25 exposure experiments, where the population response line crosses the 10% survival threshold. Desiccation survival responses for each organism reported in these papers are shown in Fig. 7. Far fewer organism responses were reported as full survival plots. Results were given as either a D10 value (e.g., points 21–24) or as the remaining viable population after 7 days (e.g., point 9) and 42 days (e.g., point 1) of desiccation.

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Ionizing radiation survival data for varied microbes extracted from the literature meta-analysis. The D10 survival threshold is indicated with a thick horizontal line at 10% remaining population. Pattern and color coding indicates the source publication. The organism identity is numbered as follows: (1) Pseudomonas sp. 17-12; (2) Nocardia sp. 17-3; (3) Escherichia coli W3110; (4) Escherichia coli MG1655; (5) Methylobacterium mesophilicum Ch8; (6) Methylobacterium extorquens 19ch; (7) Kocuria erythromyxa G38; (8) Methylobacterium mesophilicum 8-18; (9) Rhodococcus rhodochorous; (10) Kocuria rosea C2; (11) Methylobacterium extorquens B9; (12) Halobacterium sp. strain NRC1; (13) Bacillus subtilis; (14) Bacillus subtilis 28-95; (15) Deinococcus radiodurans; (16) Deinococcus grandis G8; (17) Deinococcus radiodurans R1; (18) Deinococcus maricopensis LB-34; (19) Deinococcus grandis X2; (20) Deinococcus radiodurans R1; (21) Deinococcus PO-04-20-132T; (22) Deinococcus PO-04-19-125T; (23) Deinococcus ME-04-01-32T; (24) Deinococcus ME-04-04-52T; (25) Deinococcus radiodurans R1. (Color graphics available at www.liebertonline.com/ast)

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7.

Desiccation survival data for a variety of microorganisms extracted from the literature meta-analysis. The D10 survival threshold is indicated with a thick horizontal line at 10% remaining population. Some publications provide full response curves, but many report only the remaining viable population after 7 or 42 days (appearing as vertical arrays of data points). Pattern and color coding indicate the source publication, and organism identity is numbered following that of Fig. 6. The precise survival data for Escherichia coli W3110 (point 3) was not reported in Shukla et al. (2007) and it is therefore not shown in this figure. (Color graphics available at www.liebertonline.com/ast)

Survival responses to both desiccation and radiation needed to be quantified in a similar way to test the correlation between the two environmental stresses. In the published literature, the reported desiccation resistance is the limiting factor, as full survival curves are often not provided and a range of different metrics are used in the community. Those studies were selected that either explicitly reported desiccation resistance as a D10 value or provided a full survival plot, from which D10 could be extracted, as this represents a comparable metric to that most commonly used for radiation resistance. The outcome is that out of the initial 25 data sets found in the literature, only 9 are directly comparable. These are shown in Table 2, listing the desiccation D10 and radiation D10 values extracted for the named organisms. The number label relates to the identification of the organism survival responses plotted in Figs. 6 and 7.

Table 2.

Desiccation and Radiation Survival Data Extracted from Literature Meta-Analysis

Organism Label Desiccation D10 (days) Radiation D10 (kGy) Reference
Halobacterium sp. strain NRC1 12 27* 5.0 Kottemann et al.,2005
Deinococcus maricopensis LB-34 18 62* 11.5 Rainey et al.,2005
Rhodococcus rhodochorous 9 7.0 1.0 Shukla et al.,2007
Deinococcus PO-04-19-125T 22 11.7 3.6 Callegan et al.,2008
Deinococcus PO-04-20-132T 21 8.7 2.2  
Deinococcus ME-04-01-32T 23 2.0 3.8  
Deinococcus ME-04-04-52T 24 1.8 4.0  
Deinococcus radiodurans 15 53* 11.6 Slade and Radman, 2011
Escherichia coli MG1655 4 6.6 1.04  

Only papers that reported both desiccation and radiation survival data for the same organism in a comparable form were selected. D10 values were either stated explicitly in the referenced paper or readily determinable from the presented survival plot. Number labels correspond to those for data points in Figs. 6 and 7.

*

Value obtained by a small extrapolation from provided data.

To investigate the nature of the correlation between desiccation and radiation resistance, the D10 matrices for desiccation and irradiation survival are plotted against each other for the 16 microorganisms recovered by meta-analysis and from this study (shown in Fig. 8). Organisms characterized in this present study are displayed as black triangles with letter labels in the figure caption. The irradiation D10 value at −79°C for the radiation-resistant D. radiodurans, y = 50 kGy (Richmond et al., 1999), lies so far beyond the other organisms featured that this data point was not put within the plotted range. It is, nevertheless, included in the fitted trend line. The comparable data extracted from the literature review are plotted on the same axes (using the same publication pattern/color coding and organism number labeling as Figs. 6 and 7). All the studies used a cobalt-60 gamma-ray source to expose the microbes to ionizing radiation and similar desiccation resistance tests with CaSO4 (Kottemann et al., 2005; Rainey et al., 2005; Slade and Radman, 2011), SiO2 (Callegan et al., 2008), and CaCl2 (Shukla et al., 2007; this present study) as the desiccant.

4. Discussion

4.1. Radiation exposure as a preculture screening method

In this study, MDV soil samples were used in an attempt to find novel radiation-resistant strains by using irradiation preselection and MDV environmental preselection for desiccation-resistant microbes in the MDV soils. The harsh environmental conditions of this coldest hyper-arid desert on Earth (as detailed in the introduction) pose extreme stresses on the microorganisms in the soils, which probably provided a selection for desiccation resistance in MDV soil microorganisms. In turn, the cellular biology conferring desiccation resistance is thought to incidentally confer radiation resistance (as explained in the introduction) in the microbes, providing a further selective effect for radiation-resistant strains. Indeed, desiccation-resistant microbes have been previously found in the MDV (Cowan et al., 2002; Pointing et al., 2009; Cary et al., 2010; Dartnell et al., 2010a), and both desiccation and radiation-resistant microorganisms have been previously isolated from the MDV (Billi et al., 2000; Hirsch et al., 2004).

Furthermore, gamma radiation was used to simulate the martian ionizing radiation environment because (1) gamma rays can uniformly irradiate soil sample target volumes to a well-known total dose needed for the preselection experiments here (unlike high-energy particle accelerators whose narrow beams are not able to uniformly irradiate the bulk soil samples required in this study and only emulate a small component of the complete martian cosmic ray environment) and (2) samples could be exposed to high ionizing radiation doses of up to tens of kilograys within a few hours (as opposed to thousands of years needed to accumulate such a dose during exposure in space) (Dartnell et al., 2010b). Gamma rays are commonly used in space radiobiology studies, as they offer a high flux, high penetration, and practicality of experimentation, even though the ionization they cause does not fully recreate the effects of accelerated ions on the surface and in the subsurface of Mars [discussed in detail in Dartnell et al., (2010b)]. Moreover, the high-charge/high-energy ions get fragmented or are absorbed by 2 m depth; therefore the radiation environment at greater depth is dominated by low linear energy transfer radiation, which can be more faithfully emulated by using gamma rays (Dartnell et al., 2007a, 2010b). Other studies that have previously used gamma rays as a source of ionizing radiation to simulate the martian cosmic ray environment include Kminek et al. (2003), Kminek and Bada (2006), Moeller et al. (2010), and Quinn et al. (2013). Since the purpose of this simulation study was to simulate accumulating radiation damage in dormant or cryopreserved martian life for thousands to millions of years, doses up to 15 kGy of gamma radiation were used in these experiments.

A radiation-resistant fraction of the initial microbial community was selected by exposing soil samples to 4 and 6 kGy doses of ionizing radiation, before attempting to culture survivors (Fig. 2). Cells remaining viable in the sample will have endured the radiation exposure, and this community of survivors should have contained strains possessing high radiation resistance. This expectation was later checked by performing the second irradiation experiment: a full radiation survival test on the novel strains isolated from the preselection procedure. The success of the preselection for radiation-resistant microbes within the Antarctic soil community is clear from Fig. 4. The least radiation resistant of the Halomonas novel isolates, strain MVT 463, exhibited over 2 orders of magnitude greater survival after 10 kGy than Brevundimonas sp. MV7, previously isolated without preselection. For Halomonas sp. MVT 161 the difference is more than 4 orders of magnitude.

The radiation-surviving strains, identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, belong to five bacterial genera as follows: Rhodobacter, Herbaspirillum, Hymenobacter, Staphylococcus, and Halomonas (Fig. 3). The single Rhodobacter isolate is related to purple photosynthetic bacteria that are able to fix nitrogen, which would equip cells as competent primary producers in the oligotrophic MDV environment. Radiation-resistant relatives of the Herbaspirillum genus, from Tataouine desert sand, were also isolated by preselection for ionizing radiation resistance (Chanal et al., 2006). Hymenobacter has already been identified as a genus containing ionizing radiation–resistant species, such as those isolated from irradiated pork (Collins et al., 2000). Both Rainey et al. (2005) and Zhang et al. (2007) isolated new strains of this genus from desert soil or sand samples using an ionizing radiation exposure preculturing screening method analogous to that employed in this study. One isolate was identified to be a species of Staphyloccocus. Strains of Staphylocci, Herbaspirillum, and Hymenobacter have been found in the extreme desiccating, oligotrophic, and artificial environments of several spacecraft assembly clean rooms (Venkateswaran et al., 2003; Moissl et al., 2007; Vaishampayan et al., 2010). These strains are therefore of crucial importance to astrobiology, as they represent terrestrial microbes likely to contaminate Mars during robotic (or human) space exploration, if they were to survive the planetary protection guidelines currently in place (Rummel et al., 2002; COSPAR, 2011) and the interplanetary transit to Mars. The resistance of terrestrial microorganisms during a hypothetical journey to Mars has been studied previously, for example during the EXPOSE-E mission (Horneck et al., 2012; Moeller et al., 2012; Nicholson et al., 2012).

Halomonas strains, however, have not been previously investigated in terms of ionizing radiation resistance, which is why they were selected here for further study. The Halomonas genus has been cultured previously from very saline habitats, which may provide it with the necessary cellular repair mechanisms for desiccation tolerance and therefore radiation resistance (Kottemann et al., 2005). Although all four strains showed close 16S rRNA gene similarity, Halomonas sp. MVT 463 and 464 were selected to compare against 468 as they all were cultured from the same sampling site (MVT4; exposed, dry, and fine gravel at the base of the valley wall) but exhibited different colony morphology (colored pink and yellow, respectively). Halomonas sp. MVT 161 was selected as it exhibited an indistinguishable colony morphology to 468, but it was cultured from a very different habitat (MVT1; wet ground in a floodplain). To our knowledge, only one other study has performed desiccation assays on Halomonas species [Halomonas variabilis (Burch et al., 2013)] but no radiation resistance tests. These authors found that H. variabilis experienced a >log2 reduction in survival after 6 h and ∼Log3 reduction after 1 day, compared to the isolates in this study exhibiting ∼log1 reduction after 2 days. Therefore, H. variabilis strains studied by Burch et al. (2013) were significantly less resistant to desiccation than the Halomonas strains preselected from radiation resistance in this study. In the future, the desiccation and radiation resistance properties of the four Halomonas strains studied here should be compared to those of other species of halomonads, for example from a milder climate. The characteristics of the entire group of microorganisms could be tested for in this way in order to determine whether the survival in the MDV does indeed provide halomonads with greater desiccation and radiation resistance properties. The other strains isolated from the MDV should also be tested for those two properties. Furthermore, future experiments should compare the desiccation and incidental radiation resistance of these microbes pre and post preselecting them for desiccation and radiation resistance. This will allow for the determination of the influence of the MDV habitat alone on these properties of the microorganisms.

4.2. Link between desiccation and radiation resistance

The same type of repair mechanisms for recovery from desiccation DNA damage are hypothesized to be used by cells to recover from ionizing radiation–induced DNA damage (Mattimore and Battista, 1996; Billi et al., 2000). Extreme radiation resistance is, therefore, not believed to be an adaptive strategy itself but a consequence of natural selection for desiccation survival (Mattimore and Battista, 1996). The nature of the proposed correlation between desiccation and radiation resistance has not previously been quantitatively assessed for a broad diversity of microorganisms. In this study, the correlation between the survival responses to desiccation and radiation exposure was studied for the same strains (Figs. 4 and 5). A meta-analysis of previously published data in the literature was also conducted to gather a greater data set. Only studies that reported both desiccation and ionizing radiation survival experiments on the same microorganism were included (Figs. 6–8).

Several observations can be made from the survival responses of different organisms represented in Fig. 8. Points 21 to 24 are all clustered relatively closely together in this desiccation/radiation resistance space. These are the psychrophilic, but radiation sensitive, new Deinococcus strains isolated by Callegan et al. (2008) from high-altitude (>3500 m) alpine environments, which were also found to be desiccation-sensitive and UV-sensitive. Their reduced resistance to both desiccation and radiation is clear in the Fig. 8 plot, with these strains segregating far away from the other Deinococcus species, D. radiodurans, point 15 (Slade and Radman, 2011), and D. maricopensis, point 18 (Rainey et al., 2005). The very similar survival characteristics of two unrelated organisms from separate studies, Escherichia coli [4 (Slade and Radman, 2011)] and Rhodococcus rhodochorous [9 (Shukla et al., 2007)], are also immediately apparent.

Separate trend lines were fitted to the two sets of results—the sensitivity experiments conducted in this present study and those collected from appropriate reports in the literature. This is due to the two different conditions used for the radiation exposures. The irradiations reported here were conducted frozen at −79°C on dry ice. This was planned for two reasons: to completely suspend cellular metabolism and damage repair during irradiation and to emulate martian surface conditions in the interests of astrobiology. Temperature during exposure is known to affect survival through the minimization of indirect radiation damage (Powers and Tallentire, 1968; Dartnell et al., 2010a, 2010b). In this way, the radiation survival data collected here [as well as that reported by Richmond et al. (1999)] cannot be directly compared to that generated by irradiation of samples at RT or chilled on ice, as is the case for the results extracted from the other publications. This minimization of radiation damage at very low temperatures means that the gradient of the fitted trend line for the −79°C frozen irradiation exposures (this study) is steeper than that of the RT or chilled exposures (literature data).

A clear correlation between the D10 values of the desiccation and ionizing radiation resistance for both irradiation experimental regimes (with regard to temperature) can be seen in Fig. 8. These fitted trend lines reveal that, generally, an increase in the desiccation resistance of 5 days corresponds to an increase in RT radiation resistance of 1 kGy (literature data). An increase in desiccation resistance of just over half a day corresponds to an increase in radiation resistance of 1 kGy when irradiated frozen at −79°C. This correlation was expected from the hypothesis that radiation resistance is a secondary consequence of adaptation to desiccation survival. Nevertheless, it had not been quantified before for a range of organisms (from this study and from the literature analysis). Freezing at −79°C, therefore, hypothetically increases the average bacterial radiation resistance by approximately 9-fold. By way of comparison, Thayer and Boyd (2001) reported an approximately 2-fold enhancement of radiation resistance of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Staphylococcus aureus when exposed at −20°C rather than 0°C.

5. Conclusions

This is the first study to successfully isolate radiation-resistant microbes from the Mars analog MDV using gamma-ray exposure preselection. The most numerous survivors of the highest irradiation exposures were halomonads, which were studied here for the first time for both their desiccation and irradiation survival characteristics. This study also performed the first quantitative assessment of the association between desiccation and radiation resistance for a broad diversity of microorganisms (novel strains isolated in this study and from the literature analysis). A strong correlation was found between desiccation and radiation resistance, indicating that an increase in the desiccation resistance of 5 days corresponds to an increase in the RT irradiation survival of 1 kGy. Irradiation at −79°C (representative of average martian surface temperatures) increases the microbial radiation resistance 9-fold. The cold-, desiccation-, and radiation-resistant organisms isolated here therefore represent important extremophiles for understanding the potential survival of dormant or cryopreserved life in the cold desert of the martian surface.

Abbreviations Used

CFU

colony-forming unit

MDV

McMurdo Dry Valleys

MVT

Miers Valley Transect

NB

nutrient broth

PBS

phosphate buffer solution

PCR

polymerase chain reaction

RDP

Ribosomal Database Project

RT

room temperature

Acknowledgments

L.R.D. was supported by the UCL Institute of Origins Post-Doctoral Research Associateship, and M.M. was supported by the UCL Earth Sciences Department.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  1. Aislabie J.M., Broady P.A., and Saul D.J. (2006) Culturable aerobic heterotrophic bacteria from high altitude, high latitude soil of La Gorce Mountains (86 degrees 30′S, 147 degrees W), Antarctica. Antarct Sci 18:313–321 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrett J.E., Virginia R.A., Wall D.H., and Adams B.J. (2008) Decline in a dominant invertebrate species contributes to altered carbon cycling in a low-diversity soil ecosystem. Glob Chang Biol 14:1734–1744 [Google Scholar]
  3. Billi D. and Potts M. (2002) Life and death of dried prokaryotes. Res Microbiol 153:7–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Billi D., Friedmann E.I., Hofer K.G., Caiola M.G., and Ocampo-Friedmann R. (2000) Ionizing-radiation resistance in the desiccation-tolerant cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1489–1492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bockheim J.G. (1997) Properties and classification of cold desert soils from Antarctica. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:224–231 [Google Scholar]
  6. Burch A.Y., Finkel O.M., Cho J.K., Belkin S., and Lindow S.E. (2013) Diverse microhabitats experienced by Halomonas variabilis on salt-secreting leaves. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:845–852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burkins M.B., Virginia R.A., Chamberlain C.P., and Wall D.H. (2000) Origin and distribution of soil organic matter in Taylor Valley, Antarctica. Ecology 81:2377–2391 [Google Scholar]
  8. Callegan R., Nobre M., McTernan P., Battista J., Navarro-González R., McKay C., da Costa M., and Rainey F. (2008) Description of four novel psychrophilic, ionizing radiation-sensitive Deinococcus species from alpine environments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:1252–1258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cary S.C., McDonald I.R., Barrett J.E., and Cowan D.A. (2010) On the rocks: the microbiology of Antarctic Dry Valley soils. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:129–138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chanal A., Chapon V., Benzerara K., Barakat M., Christen R., Achouak W., Barras F., and Heulin T. (2006) The desert of Tataouine: an extreme environment that hosts a wide diversity of microorganisms and radiotolerant bacteria. Environ Microbiol 8:514–525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Collins M., Hutson R., Grant I., and Patterson M. (2000) Phylogenetic characterization of a novel radiation-resistant bacterium from irradiated pork: description of Hymenobacter actinosclerus sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:731–734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. COSPAR. (2011) COSPAR Planetary Protection Policy [20 October 2002, as amended to 24 March 2011], edited by WSC, approved by the Bureau and Councils, prepared by the COSPAR/IAU Workshop on Planetary Protection (4/02, with updates 10/02, 1/08, 4/09, 12/09, 3/11), Houston, Texas, USA [Google Scholar]
  13. Cowan D.A., Russell N.J., Mamais A., and Sheppard D.M. (2002) Antarctic Dry Valley mineral soils contain unexpectedly high levels of microbial biomass. Extremophiles 6:431–436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cowan D.A., Makhalanyane T.P., Dennis P.G., and Hopkins D.W. (2014) Microbial ecology and biogeochemistry of continental Antarctic soils. Front Microbiol 5, doi:10..3389/fmicb.2014.00154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dartnell L.R. (2011) Ionizing radiation and life. Astrobiology 11:551–582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dartnell L.R., Desorgher L., Ward J.M., and Coates A.J. (2007a) Martian sub-surface ionising radiation: biosignatures and geology. Biogeosciences 4:545–558 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dartnell L.R., Desorgher L., Ward J., and Coates A. (2007b) Modelling the surface and subsurface martian radiation environment: implications for astrobiology. Geophys Res Lett 34:L02207 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dartnell L.R., Fallaize D.R., Whiting S.J., and Ward J.M. (2010a) Desiccation resistance of Antarctic Dry Valley bacteria isolated from contrasting locations. Antarct Sci 22:171–172 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dartnell L.R., Hunter S., Lovell K., Coates A., and Ward J. (2010b) Low-temperature ionizing radiation resistance of Deinococcus radiodurans and Antarctic Dry Valley bacteria. Astrobiology 10:717–732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. DeLong E.F. (1992) Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:5685–5689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Doran P.T., Priscu J.C., Lyons W.B., Walsh J.E., Fountain A.G., McKnight D.M., Moorhead D.L., Virginia R.A., Wall D.H., Clow G.D., Fritsen C.H., McKay C.P., and Parsons A.N. (2002) Antarctic climate cooling and terrestrial ecosystem response. Nature 415:517–520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dose K., Bieger-Dose A., Labusch M., and Gill M. (1992) Survival in extreme dryness and DNA-single-strand breaks. Adv Space Res 12:221–229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Farman J., Gardiner B., and Shanklin J. (1985) Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx/NOx interaction. Nature 315:207–210 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ferreira A., Nobre M., Moore E., Rainey F., Battista J., and da Costa M.S. (1999) Characterization and radiation resistance of new isolates of Rubrobacter radiotolerans and Rubrobacter xylanophilus. Extremophiles 3:235–238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gilichinsky D.A. (2002) Permafrost model of extraterrestrial habitat. In Astrobiology: The Quest for the Conditions of Life, edited by Horneck G. and Baumstark-Khan C., Springer, Berlin, pp 125–142 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gladyshev E. and Meselson M. (2008) Extreme resistance of bdelloid rotifers to ionizing radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:5139–5144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Grewal P.S., Wang X., and Taylor R.A.J. (2002) Dauer juvenile longevity and stress tolerance in natural populations of entomopathogenic nematodes: is there a relationship? Int J Parasitol 32:717–725 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hassler D.M., Zeitlin C., Wimmer-Schweingruber R.F., Ehresmann B., Rafkin S., Eigenbrode J.L., Brinza D.E., Weigle G., Böttcher S., Böhm E., Burmeister S., Guo J., Köhler J., Martin C., Reitz G., Cucinotta F.A., Kim M.H., Grinspoon D., Bullock M.A., Posner A., Gómez-Elvira J., Vasavada A., Grotzinger J.P.; MSL Science Team. (2014) Mars' surface radiation environment measured with the Mars Science Laboratory's Curiosity rover. Science 343, doi10..1126/science.1244797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hirsch P., Gallikowski C.A., Siebert J., Peissl K., Kroppenstedt R., Schumann P., Stackebrandt E., and Anderson R. (2004) Deinococcus frigens sp. nov., Deinococcus saxicola sp. nov., and Deinococcus marmoris sp. nov., low temperature and draught-tolerating, UV-resistant bacteria from continental Antarctica. Syst Appl Microbiol 27:636–645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Horneck G. (2000) The microbial world and the case for Mars. Planet Space Sci 48:1053–1063 [Google Scholar]
  31. Horneck G., Moeller R., Cadet J., Douki T., Mancinelli R.L., Nicholson W.L., Panitz C., Rabbow E., Rettberg P., Spry A., Stackebrandt E., Vaishampayan P., and Venkateswaran K.J. (2012) Resistance of bacterial endospores to outer space for planetary protection purposes—experiment PROTECT of the EXPOSE-E mission. Astrobiology 12:445–456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Horowitz N.H., Cameron R.E., and Hubbard J.S. (1972) Microbiology of the Dry Valleys of Antarctica. Science 176:242–245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jones A. and Shanklin J. (1995) Continued decline of total ozone over Halley, Antarctica, since 1985. Nature 376:409–411 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jonsson K.I. (2007) Tardigrades as a potential model organism in space research. Astrobiology 7:757–766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kminek G. and Bada J.L. (2006) The effect of ionizing radiation on the preservation of amino acids on Mars. Earth Planet Sci Lett 245:1–5 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kminek G., Bada J.L., Pogliano K., and Ward J.F. (2003) Radiation-dependent limit for the viability of bacterial spores in halite fluid inclusions and on Mars. Radiat Res 159:722–729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kottemann M., Kish A., Iloanusi C., Bjork S., and DiRuggiero J. (2005) Physiological responses of the halophilic archaeon Halobacterium sp. strain NRC1 to desiccation and gamma irradiation. Extremophiles 9:219–227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. La Duc M.T., Benardini J.N., Kempf M.J., Newcombe D.A., Lubarsky M., and Venkateswaran K. (2007) Microbial diversity of Indian Ocean hydrothermal vent plumes: microbes tolerant of desiccation, peroxide exposure, and ultraviolet and gamma-irradiation. Astrobiology 7:416–431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Levy J. (2013) How big are the McMurdo Dry Valleys? Estimating ice-free area using Landsat image data. Antarct Sci 25:119–120 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mattimore V. and Battista J. (1996) Radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans: functions necessary to survive ionizing radiation are also necessary to survive prolonged desiccation. J Bacteriol 178:633–637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. McKay C.P. (1993) Relevance of Antarctic microbial ecosystems to exobiology. In Antarctic Microbiology, Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 593–601 [Google Scholar]
  42. Moeller R., Rohde M., and Reitz G. (2010) Effects of ionizing radiation on the survival of bacterial spores in artificial martian regolith. Icarus 206:783–786 [Google Scholar]
  43. Moeller R., Reitz G., Nicholson W.L., Horneck G., and the PROTECT Team. (2012) Mutagenesis in bacterial spores exposed to space and simulated martian conditions: data from the EXPOSE-E spaceflight experiment PROTECT. Astrobiology 12:457–468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Moissl C., Osman S., La Duc M., Dekas A., Brodie E., DeSantis T., and Venkateswaran K. (2007) Molecular bacterial community analysis of clean rooms where spacecraft are assembled. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 61:509–521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nicholson W.L., Moeller R., Horneck G., and the PROTECT Team. (2012) Transcriptomic responses of germinating Bacillus subtilis spores exposed to 1.5 years of space and simulated martian conditions on the EXPOSE-E experiment PROTECT. Astrobiology 12:469–486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Nkem J.N., Virginia R.A., Barrett J.E., Wall D.H., and Li G. (2006) Salt tolerance and survival thresholds for two species of Antarctic soil nematodes. Polar Biol 29:643–651 [Google Scholar]
  47. Pavlov A., Blinov A., and Konstantinov A. (2002) Sterilization of martian surface by cosmic radiation. Planet Space Sci 50:669–673 [Google Scholar]
  48. Poage M.A., Barrett J.E., Virginia R.A., and Wall D.H. (2008) The influence of soil geochemistry on nematode distribution, McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Arct Antarct Alp Res 40:119–128 [Google Scholar]
  49. Pointing S.B., Chan Y.K., Lacap D.C., Lau M.C.Y., Jurgens J.A., and Farrell R.L. (2009) Highly specialized microbial diversity in hyper-arid polar desert. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19964–19969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Powers E. and Tallentire A. (1968) The Roles of Water in the Cellular Effects of Ionizing Radiations, Masson, Paris [Google Scholar]
  51. Quinn R.C., Martucci H.F.H., Miller S.R., Bryson C.E., Grunthaner F.J., and Grunthaner P.J. (2013) Perchlorate radiolysis on Mars and the origin of martian soil reactivity. Astrobiology 13:515–520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rainey F., Ray K., Ferreira M., Gatz B., Nobre M., Bagaley D., Rash B., Park M., Earl A., Shank N., Small A.M., Henk M.C., Battista J.R., Kämpfer P., and da Costa M.S. (2005) Extensive diversity of ionizing-radiation-resistant bacteria recovered from Sonoran Desert soil and description of nine new species of the genus Deinococcus obtained from a single soil sample. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5225–5235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Richmond R., Sridhar R., and Daly M.J. (1999) Physicochemical survival pattern for the radiophile Deinococcus radiodurans: a polyextremophile model for life on Mars. Proc SPIE 3755:210–222 [Google Scholar]
  54. Romanovskaya V.A., Rokitko P.V., Mikheev A.N., Gushcha N.I., Malashenko Y.R., and Chernaya N.A. (2002) The effect of gamma-radiation and desiccation on the viability of the soil bacteria isolated from the alienated zone around the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. [Article in Russian] Mikrobiologiia 71:705–712 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Rothschild L. and Mancinelli R. (2001) Life in extreme environments. Nature 409:1092–1101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Rummel J.D., Stabekis P.D., DeVincenzi D.L., and Barengoltz J.B. (2002) COSPAR'S planetary protection policy: a consolidated draft. Adv Space Res 30:1567–1571 [Google Scholar]
  57. Sanders S.W. and Maxcy R.B. (1979) Isolation of radiation-resistant bacteria without exposure to irradiation. Appl Environ Microbiol 38:436–439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Shukla M., Chaturvedi R., Tamhane D., Vyas P., Archana G., Apte S., Bandekar J., and Desai A. (2007) Multiple-stress tolerance of ionizing radiation-resistant bacterial isolates obtained from various habitats: correlation between stresses. Curr Microbiol 54:142–148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Slade D. and Radman M. (2011) Oxidative stress resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 75:133–191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Smith R.C., Prezelin B.B., Baker K.S., Bidigare R.R., Boucher N.P., Coley T., Karentz D., Macintyre S., Matlick H.A., Menzies D., et al. (1992) Ozone depletion: ultraviolet radiation and phytoplankton biology in Antarctic waters. Science 255:952–959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Tamppari L.K., Anderson R.M., Archer P.D., Douglas S., Kounaves S.P., McKay C.P., Ming D.W., Moore Q., Quinn J.E., Smith P.H., Stroble S., and Zent A.P. (2012) Effects of extreme cold and aridity on soils and habitability: McMurdo Dry Valleys as an analogue for the Mars Phoenix landing site. Antarct Sci 24:211–228 [Google Scholar]
  62. Thayer D.W. and Boyd G. (2001) Effect of irradiation temperature on inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Staphylococcus aureus. J Food Prot 64:1624–1626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tosi S., Onofri S., Brusoni M., Zucconi L., and Vishniac H. (2005) Response of Antarctic soil fungal assemblages to experimental warming and reduction of UV radiation. Polar Biol 28:470–482 [Google Scholar]
  64. Treonis A.M., Wall D.H., and Virginia R.A. (2000) The use of anhydrobiosis by soil nematodes in the Antarctic Dry Valleys. Funct Ecol 14:460–467 [Google Scholar]
  65. Vaishampayan P., Osman S., Andersen G., and Venkateswaran K. (2010) High-density 16S microarray and clone library–based microbial community composition of the Phoenix spacecraft assembly clean room. Astrobiology 10:499–508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Venkateswaran K., Hattori N., La Duc M.T., and Kern R. (2003) ATP as a biomarker of viable microorganisms in clean-room facilities. J Microbiol Methods 52:367–377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Vishniac H.S. (1993) The microbiology of Antarctic soils. In Antarctic Microbiology, Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 297–341 [Google Scholar]
  68. Watanabe M., Sakashita T., Fujita A., Kikawada T., Horikawa D.D., Nakahara Y., Wada S., Funayama T., Hamada N., Kobayashi Y., and Okuda T. (2006) Biological effects of anhydrobiosis in an African chironomid, Polypedilum vanderplanki, on radiation tolerance. Int J Radiat Biol 82:587–592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Weisburg W.G., Barns S.M., Pelletier D.A., and Lane D.J. (1991) 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173:697–703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Whiting S.J. (2004) Investigation of genome diversity in Antarctic Dry Valley soils. PhD thesis, University of London, London [Google Scholar]
  71. Witherow R.A., Lyons W.B., Bertler N.A.N., Welch K.A., Mayewski P.A., Sneed S.B., Nylen T., Handley M.J., and Fountain A. (2006) The aeolian flux of calcium, chloride and nitrate to the McMurdo Dry Valleys landscape: evidence from snow pit analysis. Antarct Sci 18:497–505 [Google Scholar]
  72. Wynn-Williams D.D. and Edwards H.G.M. (2000) Antarctic ecosystems as models for extraterrestrial surface habitats. Planet Space Sci 48:1065–1075 [Google Scholar]
  73. Zhang Q., Liu C., Tang Y., Zhou G., Shen P., Fang C., and Yokota A. (2007) Hymenobacter xinjiangensis sp. nov., a radiation-resistant bacterium isolated from the desert of Xinjiang, China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:1752–1756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Astrobiology are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES