Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 18;16:1072. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2271-0

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Evaluation of eel gill cell transcriptome. a Percentage distribution (number) of the 161 Sanger sequences with respective best hit grouped within different BLASTN E-value range. b Percentage distribution (number) of the 161 Sanger sequence with different full-length sizes (bp) grouped within different BLASTN E-value range