Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 18;10(12):e0144976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144976

Table 2. Subgroup meta-analysis for studies reporting the prevalence of Campylobacter in petting zoos.

Number of prevalence value inputs a Sample size Weighted mean estimate Confidence Interval (95%) I2 (%) p-value b
Overall c 20 5778 0.07 (0.04–0.09) 79.9% <0.01
Subgroup analysis
By Country
Netherlands 5 4833 0.12 (0.08–0.17) 89.9% <0.01
USA 10 309 0.03 (0.00–0.09) 67.9% <0.01
UK 3 588 0.07 (0.05–0.09) 0.0% 0.64
Germany 2 48 0.18 (0.08–0.31) 0.0% 0.36
By Region
Europe 10 5469 0.10 (0.07–0.13) 83.3% <0.01
North America 10 309 0.03 (0.00–0.09) 67.9% <0.01
By Species
Multiple species 3 2383 0.34 (0.02–0.78) 90.3% <0.01
Cattle 7 2606 0.10 (0.06–0.15) 79.6% <0.01
Sheep 2 77 0.09 (0.00–0.44) 90.1% <0.01
Swine 1 56 0.01 (0.00–0.06) . .
Horses 4 613 0.07 (0.05–0.09) 0.0% 0.67
Goats 2 42 0.10 (0.02–0.22) 0.0% 0.35
Llama 1 1 0.50 (0.00–1.00) . .

a prevalence values and sample sizes for each study provided in S3 Table.

b p-values accompany I2 values and test for heterogeneity.

c The sensitivity analysis, which used a fixed effects model, resulted in a prevalence value of 0.07 (95% CI 0.07–0.08).